Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324678›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2021

Safety and efficacy of intravenously administered cidofovir in adult haematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.

Anat Stern, Carolyn D Alonso, Carolina Garcia-Vidal, Celia Cardozo, Monica Slavin, Michelle K Yong, Su Ann Ho, Seema Mehta Steinke, Robin K Avery, Philipp Koehler and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Anat SternInfectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8659-8108
Carolyn D AlonsoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Carolina Garcia-VidalDivision of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8915-0683
Celia CardozoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Monica SlavinDepartment of Infectious Disease and the National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-314X
Michelle K YongDepartment of Infectious Disease and the National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Su Ann HoDepartment of Infectious Disease and the National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Seema Mehta SteinkeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Robin K AveryDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Philipp KoehlerFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christof ScheidFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Oliver A CornelyFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9599-3137
Johan MaertensDepartment of Hematology, Leuven, Belgium.
Yasmine Abi AadDivision of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
David J EpsteinDivision of Infectious Diseases, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8541-2623
Genovefa A PapanicolaouInfectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Dionysios NeofytosDivision of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6970-2869
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of Cologne · DEHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESJohns Hopkins University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USKU Leuven · BEStanford University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of cidofovir for the treatment of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) viral infections following allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (HCT).

methodsThis was a retrospective multicentre cohort study including adult HCT recipients who received ≥1 dose of IV-administered cidofovir for any dsDNA viral infection from 2006 to 2019. The objectives were to describe the rate of and risk factors for nephrotoxicity and virological response by the end of treatment (EOT).

resultsWe included 165 patients from nine centres. Cidofovir was administered at 5 mg/kg/week (N = 115; 69.7%), 1 mg/kg/week (18; 10.9%), 3 mg/kg/week (12; 7.3%) or 1 mg/kg three times/week (11; 6.7%). Cidofovir was administered for adenovirus, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK virus infection in 75 (45.5%), 64 (38.8%) and 51 (30.9%) patients, respectively. Among 158 patients with renal function data at baseline and EOT, 40 (25.3%) developed nephrotoxicity. In multivariable analyses, age (OR 1.04; P = 0.05), weight (OR 1.05; P = 0.01), CMV infection (OR 3.6; P = 0.02), liposomal amphotericin B (OR 8.06; P = 0.05) and IV voriconazole/posaconazole (OR 13.0; P = 0.003) were predictors of nephrotoxicity. Creatinine concentration was significantly higher at EOT (1.16 ± 0.95 mg/dL) compared with baseline (0.91 ± 0.39 mg/dL; P < 0.001), but improved by 2 weeks (0.91 ± 0.84 mg/dL; P = 0.007) and 4 weeks (0.96 ± 0.89 mg/dL; P = 0.03) post-EOT. Median viral load significantly declined for patients with adenovirus DNAaemia by EOT (P < 0.0001) and for patients with CMV DNAaemia by EOT + 4 weeks (P = 0.003), but not for patients with BK virus DNAaemia.

conclusionsOne in four HCT recipients treated with IV cidofovir developed largely reversible nephrotoxicity. Careful selection of patients and close follow-up of renal function may minimize toxicity.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationOrganophosphonatesAntiviral AgentsCidofovirCohort StudiesCytosineHumansRetrospective StudiesTransplant RecipientsAntiviral AgentsCidofovirCytosineOrganophosphonates

Identifiers

PMID34324678
PMCPMC8677452
OpenAlexW3184934753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.