Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324671›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2022

Deep Ancestral Introgression Shapes Evolutionary History of Dragonflies and Damselflies.

Anton Suvorov, Celine Scornavacca, M Stanley Fujimoto, Paul Bodily, Mark Clement, Keith A Crandall, Michael F Whiting, Daniel R Schrider, Seth M Bybee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Common misconceptions of speciation.Evolutionary journal of the Linnean Society · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anton SuvorovDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Celine ScornavaccaInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution Universiteì de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE CC 064, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France.
M Stanley FujimotoDepartment of Computer Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Paul BodilyDepartment of Computer Science, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA.
Mark ClementDepartment of Computer Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Keith A CrandallComputational Biology Institute, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Michael F WhitingDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Daniel R SchriderDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Seth M BybeeDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Brigham Young University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRGeorge Washington University · USIdaho State University · US

Funding

Advancing evolutionary genetics through deep learningR35GM138286 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DANIEL R SCHRIDER · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
Inferring selection from human population genomic dataR00HG008696 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SCHRIDER, DANIEL R · 2018 to 2020
$729k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG008696NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138286NIH HHS R00HG008696 and R35GM138286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introgression is an important biological process affecting at least 10% of the extant species in the animal kingdom. Introgression significantly impacts inference of phylogenetic species relationships where a strictly binary tree model cannot adequately explain reticulate net-like species relationships. Here, we use phylogenomic approaches to understand patterns of introgression along the evolutionary history of a unique, nonmodel insect system: dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata). We demonstrate that introgression is a pervasive evolutionary force across various taxonomic levels within Odonata. In particular, we show that the morphologically "intermediate" species of Anisozygoptera (one of the three primary suborders within Odonata besides Zygoptera and Anisoptera), which retain phenotypic characteristics of the other two suborders, experienced high levels of introgression likely coming from zygopteran genomes. Additionally, we find evidence for multiple cases of deep inter-superfamilial ancestral introgression. [Gene flow; Odonata; phylogenomics; reticulate evolution.].

Indexed as

OdonataAnimalsGenomeInsectaPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID34324671
PMCPMC9017697
OpenAlexW3185249770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.