Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324588›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Magnetic resonance radiomics features and prognosticators in different molecular subtypes of pediatric Medulloblastoma.

Feng-Chi Chang, Tai-Tong Wong, Kuo-Sheng Wu, Chia-Feng Lu, Ting-Wei Weng, Muh-Lii Liang, Chih-Chun Wu, Wan Yuo Guo, Cheng-Yu Chen, Kevin Li-Chun Hsieh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Radiomic- and dosiomic-based clustering development for radio-induced neurotoxicity in pediatric medulloblastoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Imaging diagnosis and treatment selection for brain tumors in the era of molecular therapeutics.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Review
  15. MR Imaging of Pediatric Brain Tumors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Feng-Chi ChangDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tai-Tong WongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kuo-Sheng WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Feng LuDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ting-Wei WengDepartment of Medical Imaging, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Muh-Lii LiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Chun WuDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wan Yuo GuoDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yu ChenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kevin Li-Chun HsiehDepartment of Medical Imaging, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7725-9019

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedulloblastoma (MB) is a highly malignant pediatric brain tumor. In the latest classification, medulloblastoma is divided into four distinct groups: wingless (WNT), sonic hedgehog (SHH), Group 3, and Group 4. We analyzed the magnetic resonance imaging radiomics features to find the imaging surrogates of the 4 molecular subgroups of MB. MATERIAL AND

methodsFrozen tissue, imaging data, and clinical data of 38 patients with medulloblastoma were included from Taipei Medical University Hospital and Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Molecular clustering was performed based on the gene expression level of 22 subgroup-specific signature genes. A total 253 magnetic resonance imaging radiomic features were generated from each subject for comparison between different molecular subgroups.

resultsOur cohort consisted of 7 (18.4%) patients with WNT medulloblastoma, 12 (31.6%) with SHH tumor, 8 (21.1%) with Group 3 tumor, and 11 (28.9%) with Group 4 tumor. 8 radiomics gray-level co-occurrence matrix texture (GLCM) features were significantly different between 4 molecular subgroups of MB. In addition, for tumors with higher values in a gray-level run length matrix feature-Short Run Low Gray-Level Emphasis, patients have shorter survival times than patients with low values of this feature (p = 0.04). The receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed optimal performance of the preliminary prediction model based on GLCM features for predicting WNT, Group 3, and Group 4 MB (area under the curve = 0.82, 0.72, and 0.78, respectively).

conclusionThe preliminary result revealed that 8 contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging texture features were significantly different between 4 molecular subgroups of MB. Together with the prediction models, the radiomics features may provide suggestions for stratifying patients with MB into different risk groups.

Indexed as

Cerebellar NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedulloblastomaAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMalePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID34324588
PMCPMC8321137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.