Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324572›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Inclusion of photoautotrophic cultivated diatom biomass in salmon feed can deter lice.

Hans Chr Eilertsen, Edel Elvevoll, Ingeborg Hulda Giæver, Jon Brage Svenning, Lars Dalheim, Ragnhild Aven Svalheim, Birthe Vang, Sten Siikavuopio, Ragnhild Dragøy, Richard A Ingebrigtsen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hans Chr EilertsenNorwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4335-5878
Edel ElvevollNorwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Ingeborg Hulda GiæverNorwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Jon Brage SvenningNorwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Lars DalheimNorwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Ragnhild Aven SvalheimNOFIMA Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Birthe VangNOFIMA Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Sten SiikavuopioNOFIMA Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Ragnhild DragøyNOFIMA Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Richard A IngebrigtsenNorwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2871-8888
Espen HansenNorwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Anette HustadNOFIMA Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Karl-Erik EilertsenNorwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6033-7188
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NONofima · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of diatom (microalgae) biomass as a lice-reducing ingredient in salmon feed. The original hypothesis was based on the fact that polyunsaturated aldehydes (PUAs), e.g. 2-trans, 4-trans decadenial (A3) produced by diatoms can function as grazing deterrents and harm copepod development. Salmon lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) is a copepod, and we intended to test if inclusion of diatom biomass in the feed could reduce the infestation of lice on salmon. We performed experiments where salmon kept in tanks were offered four different diets, i.e. basic feed with diatoms, fish oil, Calanus sp. oil or rapeseed oil added. After a feeding period of 67 days a statistically representative group of fishes, tagged with diet group origin, were pooled in a 4000L tank and exposed to salmon lice copepodites whereafter lice infestation was enumerated. Salmon from all four diet groups had good growth with SGR values from 1.29 to 1.44% day-1 (increase from ca. 130 g to 350 g). At the termination of the experiment the number of lice on salmon offered diatom feed were statistically significantly lower than on salmon fed the other diets. Mean lice infestation values increased from diatom feed through Calanus and fish oil to standard feed with terrestrial plant ingredients. Analysis of the chemical composition of the different diets (fatty acids, amino acids) failed to explain the differences in lice infestation. The only notable result was that diatom and Calanus feed contained more FFA (free fatty acids) than feed with fish oil and the control feed. None of the potential deleterious targeted polyunsaturated aldehydes could be detected in skin samples of the salmon. What was exclusive for salmon that experienced reduced lice was diatom inclusion in the feed. This therefore still indicates the presence of some lice deterring ingredient, either in the feed, or an ingredient can have triggered production of an deterrent in the fish. An obvious follow up of this will be to perform experiments with different degrees of diatom inclusion in the feeds, i.e. dose response experiments combined with targeted PUA analyses, as well as to perform large scale experiments under natural conditions in aquaculture pens.

Indexed as

Animal FeedBiomassCopepodaDiatomsFish DiseasesAnimalsSalmon

Identifiers

PMID34324572
PMCPMC8321285
OpenAlexW3185342897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.