Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324519›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Streamlining brain tumor surgery care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case-control study.

Regin Jay Mallari, Michael B Avery, Alex Corlin, Amalia Eisenberg, Terese C Hammond, Neil A Martin, Garni Barkhoudarian, Daniel F Kelly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted clinical care and research in Neuro-Oncology?Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2022
    Review
  12. COVID-19 and rhinological surgery.Operative techniques in otolaryngology--head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Regin Jay MallariPacific Neuroscience Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Michael B AveryPacific Neuroscience Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Alex CorlinPacific Neuroscience Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Amalia EisenbergPacific Neuroscience Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Terese C HammondSaint John's Cancer Institute (formerly John Wayne Cancer Institute), Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Neil A MartinPacific Neuroscience Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Garni BarkhoudarianPacific Neuroscience Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Daniel F KellyPacific Neuroscience Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8358-056X
Saint John's Health Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic forced a reconsideration of surgical patient management in the setting of scarce resources and risk of viral transmission. Herein we assess the impact of implementing a protocol of more rigorous patient education, recovery room assessment for non-ICU admission, earlier mobilization and post-discharge communication for patients undergoing brain tumor surgery.

methodsA case-control retrospective review was undertaken at a community hospital with a dedicated neurosurgery and otolaryngology team using minimally invasive surgical techniques, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and early post-operative imaging protocols. All patients undergoing craniotomy or endoscopic endonasal removal of a brain, skull base or pituitary tumor were included during two non-overlapping periods: March 2019-January 2020 (pre-pandemic epoch) versus March 2020-January 2021 (pandemic epoch with streamlined care protocol implemented). Data collection included demographics, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, tumor pathology, and tumor resection and remission rates. Primary outcomes were ICU utilization and hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were complications, readmissions and reoperations.

findingsOf 295 patients, 163 patients were treated pre-pandemic (58% women, mean age 53.2±16 years) and 132 were treated during the pandemic (52% women, mean age 52.3±17 years). From pre-pandemic to pandemic, ICU utilization decreased from 92(54%) to 43(29%) of operations (p<0.001) and hospital LOS≤1 day increased from 21(12.2%) to 60(41.4%), p<0.001, respectively. For craniotomy cohort, median LOS was 2 days for both epochs; median ICU LOS decreased from 1 to 0 days (p<0.001), ICU use decreased from 73(80%) to 29(33%),(p<0.001). For endonasal cohort, median LOS decreased from 2 to 1 days; median ICU LOS was 0 days for both epochs; (p<0.001). There were no differences pre-pandemic versus pandemic in ASA scores, resection/remission rates, readmissions or reoperations.

conclusionThis experience suggests the COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity for implementing a brain tumor care protocol to facilitate safely decreasing ICU utilization and accelerating discharge home without an increase in complications, readmission or reoperations. More rigorous patient education, recovery room assessment for non-ICU admission, earlier mobilization and post-discharge communication, layered upon a foundation of minimally invasive surgery, TIVA anesthesia and early post-operative imaging are possible contributors to these favorable trends.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCOVID-19CraniotomyEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryFemaleHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPandemicsPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID34324519
PMCPMC8321144
OpenAlexW3184397088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.