Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324490›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2021

Massive colonization of protein-coding exons by selfish genetic elements in Paramecium germline genomes.

Diamantis Sellis, Frédéric Guérin, Olivier Arnaiz, Walker Pett, Emmanuelle Lerat, Nicole Boggetto, Sascha Krenek, Thomas Berendonk, Arnaud Couloux, Jean-Marc Aury and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nuclear dualism without extensive DNA elimination in the ciliateProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Annual review of genetics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Diamantis SellisUniversité de Lyon, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4059-5507
Frédéric GuérinUniversité de Paris, CNRS, Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5723-4439
Olivier ArnaizUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-1015
Walker PettUniversité de Lyon, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France.
Emmanuelle LeratUniversité de Lyon, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6757-8796
Nicole BoggettoUniversité de Paris, CNRS, Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France.
Sascha KrenekTU Dresden, Institute of Hydrobiology, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas BerendonkTU Dresden, Institute of Hydrobiology, Dresden, Germany.
Arnaud CoulouxGénomique Métabolique, Genoscope, Institut de biologie François Jacob, CEA, CNRS, Université d'Évry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.
Jean-Marc AuryGénomique Métabolique, Genoscope, Institut de biologie François Jacob, CEA, CNRS, Université d'Évry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1718-3010
Karine LabadieGenoscope, Institut de biologie François-Jacob, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.
Sophie MalinskyInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8268-0067
Simran BhullarInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.
Eric MeyerInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3161-8597
Linda SperlingUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7772-4774
Laurent DuretUniversité de Lyon, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2836-3463
Sandra DuharcourtUniversité de Paris, CNRS, Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8913-8799
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRTechnische Universität Dresden · DECommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ciliates are unicellular eukaryotes with both a germline genome and a somatic genome in the same cytoplasm. The somatic macronucleus (MAC), responsible for gene expression, is not sexually transmitted but develops from a copy of the germline micronucleus (MIC) at each sexual generation. In the MIC genome of Paramecium tetraurelia, genes are interrupted by tens of thousands of unique intervening sequences called internal eliminated sequences (IESs), which have to be precisely excised during the development of the new MAC to restore functional genes. To understand the evolutionary origin of this peculiar genomic architecture, we sequenced the MIC genomes of 9 Paramecium species (from approximately 100 Mb in Paramecium aurelia species to >1.5 Gb in Paramecium caudatum). We detected several waves of IES gains, both in ancestral and in more recent lineages. While the vast majority of IESs are single copy in present-day genomes, we identified several families of mobile IESs, including nonautonomous elements acquired via horizontal transfer, which generated tens to thousands of new copies. These observations provide the first direct evidence that transposable elements can account for the massive proliferation of IESs in Paramecium. The comparison of IESs of different evolutionary ages indicates that, over time, IESs shorten and diverge rapidly in sequence while they acquire features that allow them to be more efficiently excised. We nevertheless identified rare cases of IESs that are under strong purifying selection across the aurelia clade. The cases examined contain or overlap cellular genes that are inactivated by excision during development, suggesting conserved regulatory mechanisms. Similar to the evolution of introns in eukaryotes, the evolution of Paramecium IESs highlights the major role played by selfish genetic elements in shaping the complexity of genome architecture and gene expression.

Indexed as

ExonsGenome, ProtozoanGerm CellsDNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularParamecium tetraureliaProtozoan ProteinsDNA Transposable ElementsProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34324490
PMCPMC8354472
OpenAlexW3184036930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.