Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324420›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2022

Predictive Statistical Model of Early Cranial Development.

Antonio Reyes PorrasPerez, Robert Keating, Janice Lee, Marius George Linguraru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Personalized phenotype encoding and prediction of pathological head development from cross-sectional images.... International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis. International SIPAIM Workshop · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. NEC-NET : Segmentation and Feature Extraction Network for the Neurocranium in Early Childhood.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2022
    Article
  9. Data-driven Normative Reference of Pediatric Cranial Bone Development.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonio Reyes PorrasPerez
Robert Keating
Janice Lee
Marius George Linguraru

Funding

Craniofacial Anomalies and RegenerationZIADE000746 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI LEE, JANICE · 2015 to 2025
$12.3M
Image-guided Planning System for Skull Correction in Children with Craniosynostosis: Phase IIR42HD081712 · NICHD · KITWARE, INC. · PI ENQUOBAHRIE, ANDINET ASMAMAW, LINGURARU, MARIUS GEORGE · 2016 to 2017
$1.4M
Quantitative characterization and predictive modeling of cranial bone development in patients with craniosynostosisR00DE027993 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PORRAS PEREZ, ANTONIO REYES · 2020 to 2022
$738k
Quantitative characterization and predictive modeling of cranial bone development in patients with craniosynostosisK99DE027993 · NIDCR · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PORRAS PEREZ, ANTONIO REYES · 2019 to 2020
$252k
NICHD NIH HHS R42 HD081712NIDCR NIH HHS K99 DE027993NIDCR NIH HHS R00 DE027993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe present a data-driven method to build a spatiotemporal statistical shape model predictive of normal cranial growth from birth to the age of 2 years.

methodsThe model was constructed using a normative cross-sectional computed tomography image dataset of 278 subjects. First, we propose a new standard representation of the calvaria using spherical maps to establish anatomical correspondences between subjects at the cranial sutures - the main areas of cranial bone expansion. Then, we model the cranial bone shape as a bilinear function of two factors: inter-subject anatomical variability and temporal growth. We estimate these factors using principal component analysis on the spatial and temporal dimensions, using a novel coarse-to-fine temporal multi-resolution approach to mitigate the lack of longitudinal images of the same patient.

resultsOur model achieved an accuracy of 1.54 ± 1.05 mm predicting development on an independent longitudinal dataset. We also used the model to calculate the cranial volume, cephalic index and cranial bone surface changes during the first two years of age, which were in agreement with clinical observations. SIGNIFICANCE: To our knowledge, this is the first data-driven and personalized predictive model of cranial bone shape development during infancy and it can serve as a baseline to study abnormal growth patterns in the population.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalSkullChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesHumansTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID34324420
PMCPMC8776594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.