Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324387›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2022

"I'm Being Forced to Make Decisions I Have Never Had to Make Before": Oncologists' Experiences of Caring for Seriously Ill Persons With Poor Prognoses and the Dilemmas Created by COVID-19.

Chithra R Perumalswami, Emily Chen, Carly Martin, Susan D Goold, Raymond De Vries, Jennifer J Griggs, Reshma Jagsi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transforming patient-centered cancer care using telehealth: the MATCHES Center.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chemotherapeutic Shortages: How Do We Prioritize?Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chithra R PerumalswamiCenter for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-6679-1090
Emily ChenCenter for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0001-9216-1810
Carly MartinCenter for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Susan D GooldCenter for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-0258-9774
Raymond De VriesCenter for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0003-3087-3040
Jennifer J GriggsInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-1598-4562
Reshma JagsiCenter for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0001-6562-1228
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002241 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ELLINGROD, VICKI L · 2017 to 2021
$6.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has created a new set of problems for clinicians. This study examines the experiences of oncologists providing care to seriously ill persons near the end of life in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsBetween January 2020 and August 2020, we conducted semistructured, in-depth individual interviews with 22 purposefully sampled oncologists from practices enrolled in the Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium. Deidentified transcripts of the interviews were examined using thematic analysis.

resultsOur respondents described several novel problems created by the COVID-19 pandemic, including: (1) ethical challenges, (2) the need to manage uncertainty-physically and emotionally-on the part of both patients and oncologists, and (3) the difficulty of integrating technology and communication for seriously ill persons. These problems were made more complex by features of the pandemic: resource scarcity (and the need to fairly allocate poor resources), delays in care, high levels of fear, and the increased importance of advance care planning. Nonabandonment served as a way to cope with increased stress, and the use of telemedicine became an increasingly important medium of communication.

conclusionThis study offers an in-depth exploration of the problems faced by oncologists as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and how they navigated them. Optimal decision making for seriously ill persons with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic must include open acknowledgment of the ethical challenges involved, the emotions experienced by both patients and their oncologists, and the urgent need to integrate technology with compassionate communication in determining patient preferences.

Indexed as

COVID-19OncologistsCommunicationEmpathyHumansPandemicsPrognosisSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34324387
PMCPMC8758089
OpenAlexW3184116947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.