Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324227›Full record

ArticleProteins2021

Assessment of protein model structure accuracy estimation in CASP14: Old and new challenges.

Sohee Kwon, Jonghun Won, Andriy Kryshtafovych, Chaok Seok

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Protein foundation models: a comprehensive survey.Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. AlphaFold model quality self-assessment improvement via deep graph learning.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sohee KwonDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jonghun WonDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4788-3686
Andriy KryshtafovychGenome Center, University of California, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5066-7178
Chaok SeokDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-9888
Seoul National University · KRUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Prospective analysis to determine model accuracy performance and boundaries in the post-AlphaFold2 environmentR01GM100482 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FIDELIS, KRZYSZTOF A · 2012 to 2025
$11.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In CASP, blind testing of model accuracy estimation methods has been conducted on models submitted by tertiary structure prediction servers. In CASP14, model accuracy estimation results were evaluated in terms of both global and local structure accuracy, as in the previous CASPs. Unlike the previous CASPs that did not show pronounced improvements in performance, the best single-model method (from the Baker group) showed an improved performance in CASP14, particularly in evaluating global structure accuracy when compared to both the best single-model methods in previous CASPs and the best multi-model methods in the current CASP. Although the CASP14 experiment on model accuracy estimation did not deal with the structures generated by AlphaFold2, new challenges that have arisen due to the success of AlphaFold2 are discussed.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsSoftwareComputational BiologyReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, ProteinProteinsCASP14 assessmentestimation of protein model accuracyprotein model quality assessmentprotein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID34324227
PMCPMC8616788
OpenAlexW3186243460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.