Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324124›Full record

SynthesisJournal of immigrant and minority health2022

Promotion of Resilience in Migrants: A Systematic Review of Study and Psychosocial Intervention.

Maria Ciaramella, Nadia Monacelli, Livia Concetta Eugenia Cocimano

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria CiaramellaDepartment of Letters, Arts, History and Society, University of Study of Parma, Via Kennedy, 6, 43125, Parma, PR, Italy. maria.ciaramella@studenti.unipr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0943-656X
Nadia MonacelliDepartment of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Study of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Livia Concetta Eugenia CocimanoDepartment of Letters, Arts, History and Society, University of Study of Parma, Via Kennedy, 6, 43125, Parma, PR, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to contribute to a better and more focused understanding of the link between the concept of resilience and psychosocial interventions in the migrant population. The research questions concerned the type of population involved, definition of resilience, methodological choices and which intervention programmes were targeted at migrants. In the 90 articles included, an heterogeneity in defining resilience or not well specified definition resulted. Different migratory experiences were not adequately considered in the selection of participants. Few resilience interventions on migrants were resulted. A lack of procedure's descriptions that keep in account specific migrants' life-experiences and efficacy's measures were highlighted.

Indexed as

RefugeesTransients and MigrantsHumansPsychosocial InterventionAsylum seekerInterventionMigrationRefugeesResilience

Identifiers

PMID34324124
PMCPMC9388436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.