Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324036›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2021

[Central neurological complication of an interscalene plexus catheter].

E Nöske, M Stolzer, M Racher, H Baumann, K-J Lehmann, M Henrich

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E NöskeKlinik für Anästhesie, Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, ViDia Christliche Kliniken Karlsruhe, Standort St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Steinhäuserstraße 18, 76135, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
M StolzerKlinik für Anästhesie, Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, ViDia Christliche Kliniken Karlsruhe, Standort St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Steinhäuserstraße 18, 76135, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
M RacherKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, ViDia Christliche Kliniken Karlsruhe, Standort St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
H BaumannKlinik für Anästhesie, Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, ViDia Christliche Kliniken Karlsruhe, Standort St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Steinhäuserstraße 18, 76135, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
K-J LehmannKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, ViDia Christliche Kliniken Karlsruhe, Standort St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
M HenrichKlinik für Anästhesie, Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, ViDia Christliche Kliniken Karlsruhe, Standort St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Steinhäuserstraße 18, 76135, Karlsruhe, Deutschland. michael.henrich@vincentius-ka.de.
St. Vincentius-Kliniken · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 78-year-old patient received an interscalene plexus catheter for perioperative pain therapy during implantation of an inverse shoulder prothesis. After stimulation-assisted puncture under sonographic control, 25 ml of local anesthetic (LA) were first administered and then the catheter was placed using the through the needle technique. Immediately after the administration of another 5 ml of local anesthetic via the inserted catheter, the patient showed symptoms of total spinal anesthesia, so that she had to be intubated and ventilated. The following computed tomographic diagnostics of the neck revealed an intrathecal misalignment of the plexus catheter, the tip of which was lying dorsal to the vertebral artery at the level of the 5/6 cervical vertebrae. The catheter could then be removed without any problems and there were no neurological sequelae. The use of ultrasound with clear identification of the nerve roots C5-C7 and the surrounding structures provides additional security when installing an intrascalene catheter. The spread of the LA should be traceable at all times using ultrasound and should otherwise be immediately terminated. Furthermore, a strict adherence to the needle position while inserting the catheter without manipulation of the needle depth is necessary. The first injection of the catheter has to be performed under controlled conditions, preferably connected to surveillance monitors with neurological monitoring of the awake patient and control of vital signs with direct access to the emergency equipment.

Indexed as

Nerve BlockAgedAnesthetics, LocalCathetersFemaleHumansShoulderUltrasonographyAnesthetics, LocalInterscalenePlexus anesthesiaPlexus catheterRegional anesthesiaTotal spinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID34324036
OpenAlexW3184702198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.