Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324034›Full record

ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2021

[Radiological aspects in the diagnostics of pathological fractures].

Christian von Falck, Mohamed Omar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian von FalckInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30627, Hannover, Deutschland. Falck.Christian.von@mh-hannover.de.
Mohamed OmarKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiological diagnostics play a key role in the identification and assessment of pathological fractures. Conventional projection radiography is still the mainstay of imaging investigations. With knowledge of the patient history, the morphology and location of a fracture as well as concomitant findings, such as osteolysis or periosteal reactions can add valuable information on the origin of the fracture. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice for the local diagnostic work-up as it provides insights into the medullary cavity and visualizes potential extraosseous tumor tissue in the fracture zone. Computed tomography (CT) imaging provides valuable information on the morphological features of fractures and is useful for the planning of the surgical approach. Furthermore, it is the modality of choice for whole-body staging. In most cases of pathological fractures without a history of malignancy, a biopsy and histological work-up is recommended.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneFractures, SpontaneousHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedMagnetic resonance imagingMalignancyOsteolysisRadiographyTomography, X‑ray computed

Identifiers

PMID34324034
OpenAlexW3184622128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.