Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34324012›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021

[Arousal and regulatory systems in the system of research domain criteria].

Gordon B Feld, Bernd Feige

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gordon B FeldAbteilung für Klinische Psychologie, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Deutschland. gordon.feld@zi-mannheim.de.
Bernd FeigeKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Universität Freiburg, Hauptstraße 5, 79104, Freiburg, Deutschland. bernd.feige@uniklinik-freiburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe RDoC (research domain criteria) domain arousal and regulatory systems plays an important role for psychiatric disorders.

objectiveWhat is the association between physiology and function of arousal, sleep and circadian rhythms and psychiatric disorders? What are the therapeutic consequences? MATERIAL AND

methodIn this narrative review the most important findings related to the topic are presented briefly and concisely. First, the physiology and function of the systems are described. Then the association with various psychiatric disorders is elucidated and therapeutic approaches are discussed.

resultsThe treatment of disorders of the arousal system plays a role in a broad group of psychiatric disorders. It is especially important to incorporate the disturbance of the arousal system into therapeutic concepts of affective disorders, schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and substance abuse.

conclusionThe dimensional concept of RDoC is reflected in DSM‑5 in the simultaneous registration of sleep disturbances and psychiatric disorders, which has important therapeutic consequences. The relationship between sleep function and the development of psychiatric disorders needs continued intensive research.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivitySchizophreniaSleep Wake DisordersArousalHumansSleepArousalCircadian rhythmsClinical pictureMental disordersSleep

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.