Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34323269›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2021

Segmentation and patterning of the vertebrate hindbrain.

Robb Krumlauf, David G Wilkinson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The intrinsic neuronal network of the central nervous system and its modular (subsystem) architecture in a mammal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Evolution of the essential geneProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Netrin-1 as A neural guidance protein in development and reinnervation of the larynx.Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robb KrumlaufStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9102-7927
David G WilkinsonThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6757-7080

Funding

Medical Research Council FC001217Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During early development, the hindbrain is sub-divided into rhombomeres that underlie the organisation of neurons and adjacent craniofacial tissues. A gene regulatory network of signals and transcription factors establish and pattern segments with a distinct anteroposterior identity. Initially, the borders of segmental gene expression are imprecise, but then become sharply defined, and specialised boundary cells form. In this Review, we summarise key aspects of the conserved regulatory cascade that underlies the formation of hindbrain segments. We describe how the pattern is sharpened and stabilised through the dynamic regulation of cell identity, acting in parallel with cell segregation. Finally, we discuss evidence that boundary cells have roles in local patterning, and act as a site of neurogenesis within the hindbrain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody PatterningGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksHumansRhombencephalonVertebratesAnteroposterior patterningBoundary formationCell segregationHindbrain segmentationNeurogenesis

Identifiers

PMID34323269
PMCPMC7611710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.