ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021
Disparities in Emergency Medical Services Time Intervals for Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: Findings from the North Carolina Prehospital Medical Information System.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of a disparity-reduction intervention on outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department: a clinical trial.International journal for equity in health · 2025Trial
- Age and gender patterns in emergency alarms and missions: a cross-sectional observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Prehospital 12-Lead ECG Use for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Varies by Community Social Vulnerability.Prehospital emergency care · 2026Observational
- Article
- Impact of regional medical network systems on emergency transport time for older patients in Japan: a retrospective observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Evaluation of a Specialist Nurse-Led Post-Coronary Heart Disease Support Program: A Prospective Pre-Post Interventional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Assessing variations in care delivered to rural out of hospital cardiac arrest patients in the interfacility transfer setting.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Article
- A timeliness analysis of emergency services and cardiovascular outcomes in cardiac patients referred through prehospital emergency services between 2020 and 2023: a cross-sectional study in Iran.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Impact of drone-specific dispatch instructions on the safety and efficacy of drone-delivered emergency medical treatments: A randomized simulation pilot study.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Ambulance service recognition of health inequalities and activities for reduction: An evidence and gap map of the published literature.British paramedic journal · 2024Article
- Bystander interaction with a novel multipurpose medical drone: A simulation trial.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- Current summary of the evidence in drone-based emergency medical services care.Resuscitation plus · 2023Review
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2023Review
- Prehospital Time Interval for Urban and Rural Emergency Medical Services: A Systematic Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Timely emergency medical services (EMS) response, management, and transport of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) significantly reduce delays to emergency treatment and improve outcomes. We evaluated EMS response, scene, and transport times and adherence to proposed time benchmarks for patients with suspected ACS in North Carolina from 2011 to 2017. Methods and Results We conducted a population-based, retrospective study with the North Carolina Prehospital Medical Information System, a statewide electronic database of all EMS patient care reports. We analyzed 2011 to 2017 data on patient demographics, incident characteristics, EMS care, and county population density for EMS-suspected patients with ACS, defined as a complaint of chest pain or suspected cardiac event and documentation of myocardial ischemia on prehospital ECG or prehospital activation of the cardiac care team. Descriptive statistics for each EMS time interval were computed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to quantify relationships between meeting response and scene time benchmarks (11 and 15 minutes, respectively) and prespecified covariates. Among 4667 patients meeting eligibility criteria, median response time (8 minutes) was shorter than median scene (16 minutes) and transport (17 minutes) time. While scene times were comparable by population density, patients in rural (versus urban) counties experienced longer response and transport times. Overall, 62% of EMS encounters met the 11-minute response time benchmark and 49% met the 15-minute scene time benchmark. In adjusted regression analyses, EMS encounters of older and female patients and obtaining a 12-lead ECG and venous access were independently associated with lower adherence to the scene time benchmark. Conclusions Our statewide study identified urban-rural differences in response and transport times for suspected ACS as well as patient demographic and EMS care characteristics related to lower adherence to scene time benchmark. Strategies to reduce EMS scene times among patients with ACS need to be developed and evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.