Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34322940›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2021

Automated segmentation of deep brain nuclei using convolutional neural networks and susceptibility weighted imaging.

Vincent Beliveau, Martin Nørgaard, Christoph Birkl, Klaus Seppi, Christoph Scherfler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Vincent BeliveauDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7805-279X
Martin NørgaardNeurobiology Research Unit & CIMBI, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2131-5688
Christoph BirklDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3101-4002
Klaus SeppiDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6503-1455
Christoph ScherflerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4885-5265
Innsbruck Medical University · ATCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of susceptibility-sensitive MRI techniques, such as susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), has enabled accurate in vivo visualization and quantification of iron deposition within the human brain. Although previous approaches have been introduced to segment iron-rich brain regions, such as the substantia nigra, subthalamic nucleus, red nucleus, and dentate nucleus, these methods are largely unavailable and manual annotation remains the most used approach to label these regions. Furthermore, given their recent success in outperforming other segmentation approaches, convolutional neural networks (CNN) promise better performances. The aim of this study was thus to evaluate state-of-the-art CNN architectures for the labeling of deep brain nuclei from SW images. We implemented five CNN architectures and considered ensembles of these models. Furthermore, a multi-atlas segmentation model was included to provide a comparison not based on CNN. We evaluated two prediction strategies: individual prediction, where a model is trained independently for each region, and combined prediction, which simultaneously predicts multiple closely located regions. In the training dataset, all models performed with high accuracy with Dice coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 0.95. The regional SWI intensities and volumes from the models' labels were strongly correlated with those obtained from manual labels. Performances were reduced on the external dataset, but were higher or comparable to the intrarater reliability and most models achieved significantly better results compared to multi-atlas segmentation. CNNs can accurately capture the individual variability of deep brain nuclei and represent a highly useful tool for their segmentation from SW images.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAdultAgedCerebellar NucleiFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingRed NucleusSubstantia NigraSubthalamic NucleusYoung Adultconvolutional neural networkdeep brain nucleisegmentationsusceptibility weighted imaging

Identifiers

PMID34322940
PMCPMC8449109
OpenAlexW3185263504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.