Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34322832›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2022

A rapid and feasible tool for clinical decision making in community-dwelling patients with COVID-19 and those admitted to emergency departments: the Braden-LDH-HorowITZ Assessment-BLITZ.

Erik Lagolio, Jacopo Demurtas, Roberto Buzzetti, Giorgio Cortassa, Stefania Bottone, Laura Spadafora, Cristina Cocino, Lee Smith, Thomas Benzing, Maria Cristina Polidori

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Circulating ACE2 activity predicts mortality and disease severity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Erik Lagolio *Emergency Medicine (A&E), Asl2 - Hospital Santa Corona, Pietra Ligure, Italy.
Jacopo Demurtas *Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Strada Casal Nuovo, 20 58011, Capalbio (GR), Modena, Italy. eritrox7@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3001-8546
Roberto BuzzettiClinical Epidemiologist, Bergamo, Italy.
Giorgio CortassaEmergency Medicine (A&E), Asl2 - Hospital Santa Corona, Pietra Ligure, Italy.
Stefania BottoneEmergency Medicine (A&E), Asl2 - Hospital Santa Corona, Pietra Ligure, Italy.
Laura SpadaforaEmergency Medicine (A&E), Asl2 - Hospital Santa Corona, Pietra Ligure, Italy.
Cristina CocinoEmergency Medicine (A&E), Asl2 - Hospital Santa Corona, Pietra Ligure, Italy.
Lee SmithThe Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Thomas Benzing *Ageing Clinical Research, Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine, Cologne, University of CologneFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Maria Cristina Polidori *Ageing Clinical Research, Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine, Cologne, University of CologneFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ospedale Santa Corona · ITUniversity of Cologne · DEAnglia Ruskin University · GBUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no univocal standardized strategy to predict outcomes and stratify risk of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients, notably in emergency departments. Our aim is to develop an accurate indicator of adverse outcomes based on a retrospective analysis of a COVID-19 database established at the Emergency Department (ED) of a North-Italian hospital during the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Laboratory, clinical, psychosocial and functional characteristics including those obtained from the Braden Scale-a standardized scale to quantify the risk of pressure sores which takes into account aspects of sensory perception, activity, mobility and nutrition-from the records of 117 consecutive patients with swab-positive COVID-19 disease admitted to the Emergency Medicine ward between March 1, 2020 and April 15, 2020 were included in the analysis. Adverse outcomes included admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and in-hospital death. Among the parameters collected, the highest cutoff sensitivity and specificity scores to best predict adverse outcomes were displayed by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) blood value at admission > 439 U/L, Horowitz Index (P/F Ratio) < 257 and Braden score < 18. The estimation power reached 93.6%. We named the assessment BLITZ (Braden-LDH-HorowITZ). Despite the retrospective and preliminary nature of the data, a multidimensional tool to assess overall functions, not chronological age, produced the highest prediction power for poor outcomes in relation to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Further analyses are now needed to establish meaningful correlations between ventilation therapies and multidimensional frailty as assessed by ad-hoc validated and standardized tools.

Indexed as

COVID-19Clinical Decision-MakingEmergency Service, HospitalHospital MortalityHumansIndependent LivingL-Lactate DehydrogenaseRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2L-Lactate DehydrogenaseCOVID-19EmergencyFrailtyPrognostic assessment

Identifiers

PMID34322832
PMCPMC8318055
OpenAlexW3186901160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.