Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34322734›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2022

Spindle cell lesions of the breast: a diagnostic approach.

Emad A Rakha, Edi Brogi, Isabella Castellano, Cecily Quinn

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The promise of artificial intelligence in diagnostic breast pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular pathology in breast disease: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mammary myofibroblastoma: Presentation of case.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Emad A RakhaDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK. emad.rakha@nottingham.ac.uk.
Edi BrogiDepartment of Pathology At Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Isabella CastellanoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Cecily QuinnHistopathology, BreastCheck, Irish National Breast Screening Programme and St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSt. Vincent's University Hospital · IEUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spindle cell lesions of the breast comprise a heterogeneous group of lesions, ranging from reactive and benign processes to aggressive malignant tumours. Despite their rarity, they attract the attention of breast pathologists due to their overlapping morphological features and diagnostic challenges, particularly on core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens. Pathologists should recognise the wide range of differential diagnoses and be familiar with the diverse morphological appearances of these lesions to make an accurate diagnosis and to suggest proper management of the patients. Clinical history, immunohistochemistry, and molecular assays are helpful in making a correct diagnosis in morphologically challenging cases. In this review, we present our approach for the diagnosis of breast spindle cell lesions, highlighting the main features of each entity and the potential pitfalls, particularly on CNB. Breast spindle cell lesions are generally classified into two main categories: bland-appearing and malignant-appearing lesions. Each category includes a distinct list of differential diagnoses and a panel of immunohistochemical markers. In bland-appearing lesions, it is important to distinguish fibromatosis-like spindle cell metaplastic breast carcinoma from other benign entities and to distinguish fibromatosis from scar tissue. The malignant-appearing category includes spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma, stroma rich malignant phyllodes tumour, other primary and metastatic malignant spindle cell tumours of the breast, including angiosarcoma and melanoma, and benign mimics such as florid granulation tissue and nodular fasciitis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinomaPhyllodes TumorBreastDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryApproachBreastDiagnosisImmunohistochemistrySpindle cell lesions

Identifiers

PMID34322734
PMCPMC8983634
OpenAlexW3184735645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.