ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2022
Ultrasound-guided biopsy of challenging abdominopelvic targets.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasonography-Guided Core Needle Biopsy in the Diagnostic Pathway of Pelvic Tumors.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Navigating Biopsy Safety: Complication Rates Under Ultrasound and CT Guidance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Endonephrology: Evolving Techniques of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Diagnosing Renal Lymphoma.ACG case reports journal · 2025Article
- Image-guided percutaneous mesenteric biopsy: diagnostic yield and safety profile.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Basic Techniques and Technical Tips for Ultrasound-guided Needle Puncture.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2024Review
- Ultrasound versus computed tomography guided percutaneous needle biopsy for subpleural pulmonary lesions.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsies have become the standard of practice for tissue diagnosis in the abdomen and pelvis for many sites including liver, kidney, abdominal wall, and peripheral nodal stations. Additional targets may appear difficult or impossible to safely biopsy by ultrasound due to interposed bowel loops/vasculature, deep positioning, association with the bowel, or concern for poor visibility; however, by optimizing technique, it is often possible to safely and efficiently use real-time ultrasound guidance for sampling targets that normally would be considered only appropriate for CT guided or surgical/endoscopic biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.