Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34322657›Full record

ArticleNature machine intelligence2021

Improving representations of genomic sequence motifs in convolutional networks with exponential activations.

Peter K Koo, Matt Ploenzke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Biologically Informed and Efficient DNA Sequence Learner for Predicting Functional Genomics Events.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Uncertainty-aware genomic deep learning with knowledge distillation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. InterpretingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter K KooSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Matt PloenzkeDepartment of Biostatistics, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI John Edward Moses · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
Statistical framework for assessing drug sensitivity in vitro and linking patient outcomesF99CA245736 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI PLOENZKE, MATTHEW · 2019 to 2019
$32k
NCI NIH HHS F99 CA245736NCI NIH HHS P30 CA045508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on regulatory genomic sequences tend to build representations in a distributed manner, making it a challenge to extract learned features that are biologically meaningful, such as sequence motifs. Here we perform a comprehensive analysis on synthetic sequences to investigate the role that CNN activations have on model interpretability. We show that employing an exponential activation to first layer filters consistently leads to interpretable and robust representations of motifs compared to other commonly used activations. Strikingly, we demonstrate that CNNs with better test performance do not necessarily imply more interpretable representations with attribution methods. We find that CNNs with exponential activations significantly improve the efficacy of recovering biologically meaningful representations with attribution methods. We demonstrate these results generalise to real DNA sequences across several

Identifiers

PMID34322657
PMCPMC8315445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.