ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2021
Identifying Chemical Reactions and Their Associated Attributes in Patents.
Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemical patents are an essential source of information about novel chemicals and chemical reactions. However, with the increasing volume of such patents, mining information about these chemicals and chemical reactions has become a time-intensive and laborious endeavor. In this study, we present a system to extract chemical reaction events from patents automatically. Our approach consists of two steps: 1) named entity recognition (NER)-the automatic identification of chemical reaction parameters from the corresponding text, and 2) event extraction (EE)-the automatic classifying and linking of entities based on their relationships to each other. For our NER system, we evaluate bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM)-based and bidirectional encoder representations from transformer (BERT)-based methods. For our EE system, we evaluate BERT-based, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based, and rule-based methods. We evaluate our NER and EE components independently and as an end-to-end system, reporting the precision, recall, and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.