Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34322650›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

Failure Rates of Autograft and Allograft ACL Reconstruction in Patients 19 Years of Age and Younger: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Aristides I Cruz, Jennifer J Beck, Matthew D Ellington, Stephanie W Mayer, Andrew T Pennock, Zachary S Stinson, Curtis D VandenBerg, Brooke Barrow, Burke Gao, Henry B Ellis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Pediatric ACL Injuries: A Current Concepts Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Aristides I CruzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Jennifer J BeckOrthopaedic Institute for Children, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Matthew D EllingtonDell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, and Central Texas Pediatric Orthopedics, Austin, Texas.
Stephanie W MayerSports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Andrew T PennockRady Children's Hospital, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Zachary S StinsonNemours Children's Hospital, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
Curtis D VandenBergChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
Brooke BarrowDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Burke GaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Henry B EllisTexas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas.
Brown University · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USDell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas · USOrthopaedic Institute for Children · USProvidence College · USTexas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Central Florida · USUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGraft choice for pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is determined by several factors. There is limited information on the use and outcomes of allograft ACLR in pediatric patients. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify reported failure rates of allograft versus autograft ACLR in patients ≤19 years of age with ≥2 years of follow-up. We hypothesized that there would be higher rates of failure for allograft compared with autograft ACLR in this population.

methodsPubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases were systematically searched for literature regarding allograft and autograft ACLR in pediatric/adolescent patients. Articles were included if they described a cohort of patients with average age of ≤19 years, had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, described graft failure as an outcome, and had a Level of Evidence grade of I to III. Qualitative review and quantitative meta-analysis were performed to compare graft failure rates. A random-effects model was created to compare failure events in patients receiving allograft versus autograft in a pairwise fashion. Data analysis was completed using RevMan 5.3 software (The Cochrane Collaboration).

resultsThe database search identified 1,604 studies; 203 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative review; 5 studies were included for quantitative meta-analysis. Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) represented 58.2% (n = 1,012) of the autografts, and hamstring grafts represented 41.8% (n = 727). Hybrid allografts (autograft + supplemental allograft) represented 12.8% (n = 18) of all allograft ACLRs (n = 141). The unweighted, pooled failure rate for each graft type was 8.5% for BTB, 16.6% for hamstring, and 25.5% for allograft. Allografts were significantly more likely than autografts to result in graft failure (odds ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval, 2.24 to 6.69).

conclusionsAllograft ACLR in pediatric and adolescent patients should be used judiciously, as existing studies revealed a significantly higher failure rate for allograft compared with autograft ACLR in this patient population. Additional studies are needed to improve the understanding of variables associated with the high ACLR failure rate among pediatric and adolescent patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID34322650
PMCPMC8312832
OpenAlexW3114649516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.