ArticleJB & JS open access
Failure Rates of Autograft and Allograft ACL Reconstruction in Patients 19 Years of Age and Younger: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric and Skeletally Immature Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The American journal of sports medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes of different autografts used for all-epiphyseal, partial epiphyseal or transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients - a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Pooled it
- Excellent 2-Year Outcomes of MUIB All-Inside ACL Reconstruction: A Registry-Based Analysis of 63 Patients With Zero Graft Failure.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- The Current State of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Graft Selection, Lateral Augmentation, Rehabilitation, and Return-to-Play.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Biomechanical Considerations of Graft Selection-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes: A Narrative Review.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Pediatric ACL Injuries: A Current Concepts Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Autograft vs Allograft in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Review
- Remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft yields the lowest re-rupture rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Age-Related Increases in Graft Tendon Size and Stiffness During Skeletal Growth Enhance Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Function and Joint Stability in an Early Adolescent Porcine Model.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
- Differences in Graft Rupture and Subsequent Meniscal Tears Following Adolescent ACL Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon Versus Hamstrings Autograft: A Retrospective Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Sport-Specific Considerations in ACL Reconstruction: Diagnostic Evaluation and Graft Selection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Intermediate Duration Outcomes After Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Comparing Adolescents With and Without Suture Tape Reinforcement.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
- Delayed Simultaneous Reconstruction of the ACL and MCL Using Ipsilateral Single Hamstring Tendon Autograft With A Modified Technique.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Hybrid Over-the-Top Femoral Fixation, Transphyseal Tibial Fixation, and Tibial All-Epiphyseal Anterolateral Ligament Fixation Using Attached Hamstring Autograft.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Biomechanical Comparison of ACL-R Using an Iliotibial Band Autograft Reinforcement and Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft With and Without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Similar graft rerupture rates after ACL reconstruction with or without lateral extra-articular procedure in patients over 40 years.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Significant Variation in Quadriceps Tendon Thickness Is Observed Among Cadaveric Specimens.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Combined revision ACL reconstruction with slope-correction osteotomy and lateral extra-articular tenodesis improves stability in patients with high posterior tibial slope and pivot shift.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGraft choice for pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is determined by several factors. There is limited information on the use and outcomes of allograft ACLR in pediatric patients. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify reported failure rates of allograft versus autograft ACLR in patients ≤19 years of age with ≥2 years of follow-up. We hypothesized that there would be higher rates of failure for allograft compared with autograft ACLR in this population.
methodsPubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases were systematically searched for literature regarding allograft and autograft ACLR in pediatric/adolescent patients. Articles were included if they described a cohort of patients with average age of ≤19 years, had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, described graft failure as an outcome, and had a Level of Evidence grade of I to III. Qualitative review and quantitative meta-analysis were performed to compare graft failure rates. A random-effects model was created to compare failure events in patients receiving allograft versus autograft in a pairwise fashion. Data analysis was completed using RevMan 5.3 software (The Cochrane Collaboration).
resultsThe database search identified 1,604 studies; 203 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative review; 5 studies were included for quantitative meta-analysis. Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) represented 58.2% (n = 1,012) of the autografts, and hamstring grafts represented 41.8% (n = 727). Hybrid allografts (autograft + supplemental allograft) represented 12.8% (n = 18) of all allograft ACLRs (n = 141). The unweighted, pooled failure rate for each graft type was 8.5% for BTB, 16.6% for hamstring, and 25.5% for allograft. Allografts were significantly more likely than autografts to result in graft failure (odds ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval, 2.24 to 6.69).
conclusionsAllograft ACLR in pediatric and adolescent patients should be used judiciously, as existing studies revealed a significantly higher failure rate for allograft compared with autograft ACLR in this patient population. Additional studies are needed to improve the understanding of variables associated with the high ACLR failure rate among pediatric and adolescent patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.