Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34322553›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2021

Particle flow rate from the airways as fingerprint diagnostics in mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled study.

Filip Hallgren, Martin Stenlo, Anna Niroomand, Ellen Broberg, Snejana Hyllén, Malin Malmsjö, Sandra Lindstedt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Filip HallgrenDept of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Transplantation, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Martin StenloCardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anna NiroomandWallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ellen BrobergCardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Snejana HyllénCardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Malin MalmsjöDept of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sandra LindstedtDept of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Transplantation, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4484-6473
Lund University · SERutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMechanical ventilation can be monitored by analysing particles in exhaled air as measured by particle flow rate (PFR). This could be a potential method of detecting ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) before changes in conventional parameters can be detected. The aim of this study was to investigate PFR during different ventilation modes in patients without lung pathology.

methodA prospective study was conducted on patients on mechanical ventilation in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU). A PExA 2.0 device was connected to the expiratory limb on the ventilator for continuous measurement of PFR in 30 patients randomised to either volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) for 30 min including a recruitment manoeuvre. PFR measurements were continued as the patients were transitioned to pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) and then pressure support ventilation (PSV) until extubation.

resultsPRVC resulted in significantly lower PFR, while those on PSV had the highest PFR. The distribution of particles differed significantly between the different ventilation modes.

conclusionsMeasuring PFR is safe after cardiac surgery in the ICU and may constitute a novel method of continuously monitoring the small airways in real time. A low PFR during mechanical ventilation may correlate to a gentle ventilation strategy. PFR increases as the patient transitions from controlled mechanical ventilation to autonomous breathing, which most likely occurs as recruitment by the diaphragm opens up more distal airways. Different ventilation modes resulted in unique particle patterns and could be used as a fingerprint for the different ventilation modes.

Identifiers

PMID34322553
PMCPMC8311139
OpenAlexW3175867420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.