Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34322473›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of High-Risk Groups Tuberculosis Screening in Malaysia.

Nor Zam Azihan Mohd Hassan, Asmah Razali, Mohd Ridzwan Shahari, Mohd Shaiful Jefri Mohd Nor Sham Kunusagaran, Juanita Halili, Nur Amalina Zaimi, Mohd Shahri Bahari, Farhana Aminuddin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and validation of the Tuberculosis Diabetes Mellitus-Predictive Tool (TBDM-PT) in primary care.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nor Zam Azihan Mohd HassanInstitute for Health Systems Research, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Asmah RazaliDisease Control Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Mohd Ridzwan ShahariMedical Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Mohd Shaiful Jefri Mohd Nor Sham KunusagaranInstitute for Health Systems Research, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Juanita HaliliInstitute for Health Systems Research, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Nur Amalina ZaimiInstitute for Health Systems Research, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Mohd Shahri BahariInstitute for Health Systems Research, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Farhana AminuddinInstitute for Health Systems Research, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Ministry of Health · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening of high-risk groups for Tuberculosis (TB) is considered as the cornerstone for TB elimination but the measure of cost-effectiveness is also crucial in deciding the strategy for TB screening. This study aims to measure the cost-effectiveness of TB screening between the various high-risk groups in Malaysia. A decision tree model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of TB screening among the high-risk groups from a provider perspective using secondary data from the year 2016 to 2018. The results are presented in terms of an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per TB case detected. Deterministic and Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis was also performed to measure the robustness of the model. TB screening among Person Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PL HIV) was the most cost-effective strategy, with MYR 2,597.00 per TB case detected. This was followed by elderly, prisoners and smokers with MYR 2,868.62, MYR 3,065.24, and MYR 4,327.76 per one TB case detected, respectively. There was an incremental cost of MYR 2.49 per screening, and 3.4 TB case detection per 1,000 screening for TB screening among PL HIV in relation to TB screening among prisoners. The probability of symptomatic cases diagnosed as TB was the key driver for increasing cost-effectiveness efficacy among PL HIV. Results of the study suggest prioritization of high-risk group TB screening program by focusing on the most cost-effective strategy such as screening among PL HIV, prisoners and elderly, which has a lower cost per TB case detected.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsTuberculosisAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMalaysiaMass Screeningcost-effectivenesshigh-risk groupTB programTB screeningtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID34322473
PMCPMC8310930
OpenAlexW3181610752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.