Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34322440›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021

Assessment of the knowledge, preferences and concern regarding the prospective COVID-19 vaccine among adults residing in New Delhi, India - A cross-sectional study.

Farzana Islam, Rashmi Agarwalla, Meely Panda, Yasir Alvi, Vishal Singh, Arup Debroy, Arindam Ray, Amruta Vadnerkar, Shraddha Uttekar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Attitude and perception of COVID-19 vaccines in healthcare workers.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. COVID-19 Vaccine Demand and Financial Incentives.Applied health economics and health policy · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Farzana IslamDepartment of Community Medicine, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India.
Rashmi AgarwallaDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All Indian Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Meely PandaDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All Indian Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Telangana, India.
Yasir AlviDepartment of Community Medicine, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India.
Vishal SinghDepartment of Community Medicine, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India.
Arup DebroyPublic Health Expert, International Paediatric Association, New Delhi, India.
Arindam RayPublic Health Expert, International Paediatric Association, New Delhi, India.
Amruta VadnerkarProject Manager, International Paediatric Association, New Delhi, India.
Shraddha UttekarProject Manager, International Paediatric Association, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the perception and concerns of people about COVID-19 vaccine in developing and populous country like India will help in understanding demand for the vaccine and further tailoring out public health information and education activities. The study was carried out to assess the present state of knowledge people have about the probable vaccine for COVID-19, to know the preferences of respondents about this vaccine and to learn the expectations and apprehensions of people about features of this prospective COVID-19 vaccine residing in the capital city of India.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted amongst the residents of Delhi, India from July to October 2020. Both offline and online interview method was used to collect date from 513 participants representing various occupational strata. Data were collected on sociodemographic variable, vaccine acceptance and concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine.

resultsAmong the study population, 79.5% said they will take the vaccine while 8.8% said they were not going to take the vaccine and remaining 11.7% had not yet decided about it. More than 50% were willing to pay for the vaccine and 72% felt vaccine should first be given to health workers and high-risk group.

conclusionThe following study has helped to understand the percentage of people who are hesitant to take the vaccine and also the concerns regarding the vaccine. Also since half of the population is willing to pay for the vaccine, a strategic approach considering the various economical classes of people could be applied in a developing country like India.

Indexed as

COVID-19IndiaNew Delhivaccine acceptance

Identifiers

PMID34322440
PMCPMC8284199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.