Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34322359›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

A Comprehensive Review of Transaminitis and Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Eyad Gadour, Zeinab Hassan, Rajaey Gadour

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eyad GadourGastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Lancaster, GBR.
Zeinab HassanDepartment of Medicine, Stockport Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Rajaey GadourResponsible Medical Services, The National Ambulance, Abu Dhabi, ARE.
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We observed in the literature that irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may be linked to irregular parameters of the metabolic system (MS) and liver function. For that reason, we conducted this systematic review to comprehensively analyze the association of transaminitis (elevated alanine transaminase (ALT)) with IBS. This review was designed by following methods described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Published peer-reviewed journal articles were included. Data were extracted based on study design, age, gender, author, date of publication or availability online, publication type, participants, gender (M/F), and types of IBS. Our electronic multiple databases yielded a total of 519 preliminary studies; we then removed duplicate studies and left with 326 studies. After reviewing the full text of these articles, a total of 83 studies were eliminated and lastly, three studies were selected for this systematic review for quantitative and qualitative analysis. All the enrolled subjects in included studies were diagnosed with IBS by the Rome II and III criteria and among these sub-jects, 50.4% had IBS-D, 13.8% had IBS-C, 30.3% had IBS-M, and 3.5% had IBS-U. The prevalence of elevated ALT with other liver enzymes (γ-GT levels and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome whether their body mass index (BMI) was high or not (16.9% vs. 7.7%;

Indexed as

diarrhoeairritable bowel diseaseliver transplantsmall bowel bacterial overgrowthtransaminitis

Identifiers

PMID34322359
PMCPMC8300593
OpenAlexW3185017294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.