Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34322333›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

A Standardized Evaluation Method for Assessing Patients With Genital Dyschromia.

Rafael Alves, Tâmara Gomes, Priscilla Baqueiro, Patrícia Fróes Meyer, Daniela Barros, Antonio Schiattarella, Michele Fichera, Laizza Silva, Brenda Ianca de Santana, Patrícia Lordelo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rafael AlvesPelvic Floor Care Center, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, BRA.
Tâmara GomesPelvic Floor Care Center, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, BRA.
Priscilla BaqueiroPelvic Floor Care Center, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, BRA.
Patrícia Fróes MeyerPhysiotherapy, Potiguar University, Natal, BRA.
Daniela BarrosPelvic Floor Care Center, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, BRA.
Antonio SchiattarellaGeneral and Specialized Surgery for Women and Children, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, ITA.
Michele FicheraGeneral Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, ITA.
Laizza SilvaPelvic Floor Care Center, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, BRA.
Brenda Ianca de SantanaPelvic Floor Care Center, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, BRA.
Patrícia LordeloMedicine, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, BRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The population's ever-growing concern with genital aesthetic dysfunctions reflects an increasing demand in the field of intimate aesthetics. For this reason, as well as the lack of a standardized evaluation, this paper aims to develop a form that facilitates the initial investigation of aesthetic genital dysfunctions.  Methods An evaluation form for female and male genital dyschromia was developed between July and November 2018. Following initial development, the form was evaluated for quality and was updated by a panel of specialists (a psychologist, two pelvic dysfunction physiotherapists, and two dermato-functional physiotherapists) via email and through a content validity questionnaire. The face validity of the form was assessed by five physiotherapy and medical students who were randomly selected. The students answered a questionnaire evaluating the proposed form. The reliability of the form was established through the test-retest procedure by evaluating its reproducibility over time. Results The "Genital Dyschromia Evaluation Form'' (composed of identification, anamnesis, and physical examination sections) was approved by the specialist panel. They suggested questions to be added in the anamnesis (dermatological lesions or fungal and bacterial infections) and physical examination (hyperemia, edema in the perianal and internal thigh region) sections. As for the image analysis, an increase in quality, resolution, and sharpness was suggested. Lastly, for the cutaneous phototype evaluation, the DoctorSkinFototipo® digital analyzer device was chosen since it is small, portable, easily positioned on the genital area, and can be readily cleaned between patients.  Conclusion The "Genital Dyschromia Evaluation Form" is a questionnaire approved by specialists and could represent a suitable option for health professionals.

Indexed as

aesthetic dermatologyaesthetic gynaecologyclinical evaluationskin pigmentationuro- gynaecology

Identifiers

PMID34322333
PMCPMC8298189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.