ArticlePeerJ2021
Lots of movement, little progress: a review of reptile home range literature.
Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of Movement Patterns: Physiology and Sex Influence Gopher Tortoise (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Review
- Extreme spatial confinement and high site fidelity in a crevice-dwelling lizard with a minimal home range.BMC zoology · 2025Article
- Extremely limited spatial and temporal utilization for wild Chinese alligator (Biology letters · 2025Article
- Using High-Resolution Radiotracking to Improve Inference About the Spatial Ecology of Small, Slow-Moving Ectotherms.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Landscapes, habitat, and migratory behaviour: what drives the summer movements of a Northern viper?Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Understanding and predicting animal movements and distributions in the Anthropocene.The Journal of animal ecology · 2025Review
- Shelter Distribution and Type Affect Space Use of a Desert Reptile.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Episodic Gregariousness Leads to Level-Dependent Core Habitats: A Case Study in Eastern Copperheads (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Climate change-induced shifts in survival and size of the worlds' northernmost oviparous snake: A 68-year study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Home range ecology of Indian rock pythons (Python molurus) in Sathyamangalam and Mudumalai Tiger Reserves, Tamil Nadu, Southern India.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Sex-specific movement ecology of the shortest-lived tetrapod during the mating season.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Malayan kraits (Bungarus candidus) show affinity to anthropogenic structures in a human dominated landscape.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Artificial shelters provide suitable thermal habitat for a cold-blooded animal.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Promoting co-existence between humans and venomous snakes through increasing the herpetological knowledge base.Toxicon: X · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reptiles are the most species-rich terrestrial vertebrate group with a broad diversity of life history traits. Biotelemetry is an essential methodology for studying reptiles as it compensates for several limitations when studying their natural history. We evaluated trends in terrestrial reptile spatial ecology studies focusing upon quantifying home ranges for the past twenty years. We assessed 290 English-language reptile home range studies published from 2000-2019 via a structured literature review investigating publications' study location, taxonomic group, methodology, reporting, and analytical techniques. Substantial biases remain in both location and taxonomic groups in the literature, with nearly half of all studies (45%) originating from the USA. Snakes were most often studied, and crocodiles were least often studied, while testudines tended to have the greatest within study sample sizes. More than half of all studies lacked critical methodological details, limiting the number of studies for inclusion in future meta-analyses (55% of studies lacked information on individual tracking durations, and 51% lacked sufficient information on the number of times researchers recorded positions). Studies continue to rely on outdated methods to quantify space-use (including Minimum Convex Polygons and Kernel Density Estimators), often failing to report subtleties regarding decisions that have substantial impact on home range area estimates. Moving forward researchers can select a suite of appropriate analytical techniques tailored to their research question (dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models for within sample interpolation, and autocorrelated Kernel Density Estimators for beyond sample extrapolation). Only 1.4% of all evaluated studies linked to available and usable telemetry data, further hindering scientific consensus. We ultimately implore herpetologists to adopt transparent reporting practices and make liberal use of open data platforms to maximize progress in the field of reptile spatial ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.