ArticleAmerican journal of blood research2021
Prevalence of positive factor V Leiden and prothrombin mutations in samples tested for thrombophilia in Saudi Arabia.
Article in American journal of blood research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Review of Gene Mutations in Inherited Blood Disorders Among the Saudi Population.Human mutation · 2026Review
- Clinical Impact of Inherited Thrombophilia in Patients With Thrombosis: Evaluating the Real Risk of FVL, PTG20210A, and MTHFR Mutations in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a multifactorial disease that results from the interaction of both inherited and acquired risk factors. The complications of these risk factors often lead to significant morbidity and mortality. There are many inherited thrombophilia risk factors, such as factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin gene mutation (PT). The prevalence of these mutations varies among geographical locations and ethnic groups.
objectivesThis is a retrospective analysis of laboratory data aimed to estimate the laboratory-based frequency of FVL and PT mutations and assess the concordance between the coagulation assay and FVL molecular test.
methodsThe study reviewed the frequency of positive blood samples tested by molecular and functional-based techniques. The demographic and laboratory data of patients tested in molecular and coagulation laboratories at the Institute for Thrombophilia were reviewed and analyzed.
resultsA total of 1524 samples were tested for FVL, 1023 for PT, and 1057 for APCR. Results showed that 90 (5.9%) patients were positive for FVL, 30 (2.93%) for PT mutations, and 95 (8.99%) had low APCR, while 38 (3.69%) patients had low APCR with no FVL mutation.
conclusionThis study reports high positive results among patients tested as part of thrombophilia workup or screening for other clinical conditions associated with the increased risk of thrombosis. The limitation of this study was that it had minimal clinical correlation because the data were collected retrospectively from laboratory records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34322288PMC8303010What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.