ArticleAmerican journal of blood research2021
Safety and efficacy of azathioprine in immune thrombocytopenia.
Article in American journal of blood research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil for pediatric autoimmune cytopenia: a propensity score-matched study.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Contemporary and prospective use of azathioprine (AZA) in viral, rheumatic, and dermatological disorders: a review of pharmacogenomic and nanotechnology applications.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- A Case Series and Literature Review on Zanubrutinib Therapy for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Role of azathioprine in the management of ITP in the TPO-RA era: a single-center retrospective study.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2025Article
- The Many Faces of Immune Thrombocytopenia: Mechanisms, Therapies, and Clinical Challenges in Oncological Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- Bleeding risk assessment in immune thrombocytopenia.Annals of hematology · 2023Article
- Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Role of topical and systemic immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Older Adults and Immune Thrombocytopenia: Considerations for the Clinician.Clinical interventions in aging · 2023Review
- Influence of the Photodegradation of Azathioprine on DNA and Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Real-world experience of anti-D immunoglobulin in immune thrombocytopenia.Annals of hematology · 2022Article
- Safety and efficacy of splenectomy in immune thrombocytopenia.American journal of blood research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a benign hematological disorder characterized by low platelet counts in peripheral blood and spectrum of various bleeding manifestations. Azathioprine is one of the effective, readily available, and affordable immunosupressants available for ITP management in developing countries. We aimed to study the efficacy and long-term safety profile of our patients with ITP who were treated with azathioprine.
methodThis was a retrospective, single-center study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. The patients who had received at least one line of therapy before receiving azathioprine were included in this study. All patients received oral azathioprine at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day (50 mg or 100 mg tablet formulations were used), which was increased up to 2 mg/kg/day depending upon the response and adverse effects.
resultSixty-three patients were analyzed. Their median age was 28 years (range 15-68); 29/63 patients (46.03%) were females. The median duration from diagnosis to azathioprine initiation was 539 days (323 days-980.5 days). The patients included in the study had received a median of 3 (range 1-6) prior lines of therapies; 38/63 patients (60.32%) had received ≥3 prior therapies. Six patients (9.5%) had relapsed after splenectomy, and 16 patients (25.4%) had relapsed after receiving rituximab. The mean baseline platelet count was 10000/μL. The median time to response was 95 days (90 days-not reached) and the cumulative overall response rate (complete and partial response) at day 90 was 38.1%. Only one patient achieved complete response with azathioprine in our study. The cumulative rate of relapse at five years was 21.2%. Twenty-six patients stopped azathioprine after achieving some response (CR/PR) with Azathioprine for a median duration of 1067.5 days (range: 236 days-2465 days). They were followed up for a median of 870 days (range: 392 days-1928 days), and twelve of them relapsed. Twenty-six patients (26/63, 41.27%) reported one or more adverse events while on azathioprine. Leucopenia was the most frequent adverse event, followed by anemia and hepatobiliary laboratory abnormalities. Serious adverse events (grade ≥3 CTCAEv4) were noted in three patients (4.7%). One patient succumbed to severe sepsis multiorgan dysfunction while being on treatment.
conclusionWe conclude that azathioprine has a good response rate in chronic ITP patients. It is well-tolerated with minimal and manageable side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34322284PMC8303009W3185366502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.