Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34322185›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2021

The effectiveness of image-guided percutaneous catheter drainage in the management of acute pancreatitis-associated pancreatic collections.

Kifayat H Ganaie, Naseer A Choh, Arshed H Parry, Feroze A Shaheen, Irfan Robbani, Tariq A Gojwari, Manjeet Singh, Omar J Shah

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Percutaneous Biopsy and Drainage of the Pancreas.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kifayat H GanaieSher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Naseer A ChohSher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Arshed H ParrySher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Feroze A ShaheenSher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Irfan RobbaniSher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Tariq A GojwariSher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Manjeet SinghSher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Omar J ShahSher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcute pancreatitis is commonly complicated by the development of pancreatic collections (PCs). Symptomatic PCs warrant drainage, and the available options include percutaneous, endoscopic, and open surgical approaches. The study aimed to assess the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of image guided percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in the management of acute pancreatitis related PCs. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis was a single-centre prospective study covering a 4-year study period. Acute pancreatitisrelated PCs complicated by secondary infection or those producing symptoms due to pressure effect on surrounding structures were enrolled and underwent ultrasound or computed tomography (CT)-guided PCD. The patients were followed to assess the success of PCD (defined as clinical, radiological improvement, and the avoidance of surgery) and any PCD-related complications.

resultsThe study included 60 patients (60% males) with a mean age of 43.1 ± 21.2 years. PCD recorded a success rate of 80% (16/20) for acute peripancreatic fluid collections (APFC) and pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs), 75% (12/16) for walled-off necrosis (WON), and 50% (12/24) for acute necrotic collections (ANCs). Post-PCD surgery (necrosectomy ± distal pancreatectomy) was needed in 50% of ANC and 25% of WON. Only 20% of APFCs/PPs patients required surgical/endoscopic treatment post-PCD. Minor procedure-related complications were seen in 4 (6.6%) patients.

conclusionPCD is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive therapeutic modality with a good success rate in the management of infected/symptomatic PCs.

Indexed as

acute necrotic collectionpancreatic collectionspercutaneous catheter drainagepseudocystwalled-off necrosis

Identifiers

PMID34322185
PMCPMC8297482
OpenAlexW3182658126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.