ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021
Performing Multilingual Analysis With Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 (LIWC2015). An Equivalence Study of Four Languages.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Affective language and transdiagnostic symptom burden in clinically referred adolescents: a multicenter Turkish sentence-completion study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Personality Traits and Emotional Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Canadian Emerging Adults.Emerging adulthood (Print) · 2025Article
- Detecting depression in speech using verbal behavior analysis: a cross-cultural study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges.SIGKDD explorations : newsletter of the Special Interest Group (SIG) on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2024Article
- Topic modelling and sentiment analysis during COVID-19 revealed emotions changes for public health.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Large Language Model-Based Responses to Patients' In-Basket Messages.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Elucidating the emotional persona in the Romanian university students' academic discourse: a corpus-based exploration.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Talking Cancer-Cancer Talking: A Linguistic and Thematic Analysis of Patient Narratives.Journal of patient experience · 2024Article
- Linguistic markers for major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional study using an automated procedure.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Personality and Word Use: Study on Czech Language and the Big Five.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2022Article
- Detection of Types of Mental Illness through the Social Network Using Ensembled Deep Learning Model.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Beyond English: Considering Language and Culture in Psychological Text Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Today, there is a range of computer-aided techniques to convert text into data. However, they convey not only strengths but also vulnerabilities compared to traditional content analysis. One of the challenges that have gained increasing attention is performing automatic language analysis to make sound inferences in a multilingual assessment setting. The current study is the first to test the equivalence of multiple versions of one of the most appealing and widely used lexicon-based tools worldwide, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 (LIWC2015). For this purpose, we employed supervised learning in a classification problem and computed Pearson's correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients on a large corpus of parallel texts in English, Dutch, Brazilian Portuguese, and Romanian. Our findings suggested that LIWC2015 is a valuable tool for multilingual analysis, but within-language standardization is needed when the aim is to analyze texts sourced from different languages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.