Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34321949›Full record

ReviewClinical optometry2021

Midday Fogging of Scleral Contact Lenses: Current Perspectives.

Jennifer Swingle Fogt

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical optometry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Scleral Lens Fenestrations and Fluid Reservoir Debris.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Agreement between extrapolated corneoscleral topographical data obtained during natural and retracted eyelid positions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  7. Variation of Bruch's membrane opening in response to intraocular pressure change during scleral lens wear, in a population with keratoconus.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Lens and solution properties in patients with and without midday fogging.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer Swingle FogtThe Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6036-6926
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Midday fogging is a common problem in scleral lens wear, as particles accumulate in the tear reservoir between the posterior surface of the lens and the front of the ocular surface during wear. As particulate waste collects, symptoms of blurred vision and discomfort arise, typically leading patients to remove their lenses for cleaning, refilling with fresh solution, and reinsertion into the eye. The appearance of the particulate can vary, likely due to different causes for midday fogging. Studies which attempted to identify the particulate have given some insight into some of the causes, but larger studies are needed to identify this debris. Research on lens solutions used for filling the lens reservoir and of various aspects of scleral lens fits have also begun to culminate in the concept that midday fogging may ultimately be related to inflammation. Since scleral lens wearers can have varied and multiple sources of inflammation, strategies in minimizing midday fogging can differ between patients.

Indexed as

interrupted scleral lens wearmidday foggingpost-lens tear reservoirscleral lensesturbidity

Identifiers

PMID34321949
PMCPMC8311169
OpenAlexW3186480254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.