Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34321921›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2021

One-Year, Efficacy and Safety Open Label Study, with a Single Injection of a New Hyaluronan for Knee OA: The SOYA Trial.

Carlos Gavín, Francisco J Blanco, José L Pablos, Miguel A Caracuel, José Rosas, Enrique Gómez-Barrena, Francisco Navarro, María Pilar Coronel, Mercedes Gimeno

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03852914 (Prospective, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intraarticular Sodium Hyaluronate Single Injection in Patients Suffering From Osteoarthritis of the Knee), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03852914 naunknown statusnot on this map

Prospective, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intraarticular Sodium Hyaluronate Single Injection in Patients Suffering From Osteoarthritis of the Knee

TypeinterventionalSponsorTedec-Meiji Farma, S.A.Ran2019 to 2020Enrolled93ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsSodium hyaluronate 2%
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carlos GavínHospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3116-7204
Francisco J BlancoComplejo Hospitalario Universitario aCoruña, La Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9821-7635
José L PablosHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel A CaracuelHospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
José RosasHospital Marina Baixa, Villajoyosa, Alicante, Spain.
Enrique Gómez-BarrenaHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco NavarroHospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain.
María Pilar CoronelMeiji Pharma Spain, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes GimenoMeiji Pharma Spain, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the efficacy and safety of a single injection of a new formulation of hyaluronic acid (MPS-HA2%) in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis after 12 months' follow-up. PATIENTS AND

methodsProspective, single-arm, multicentre, open-label, 12-month follow-up study. Patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) 2-3 and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores of ≥40-< 80 mm received a single injection of MPS-HA2%. The primary outcome was the reduction in VAS pain scores from baseline, and the secondary outcomes were the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the minimum clinically important improvement (MCII), and patient and investigator global assessments (PGA, IGA) measured on 5-point Likert scale. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study for safety purposes.

resultsA total of 101 patients (mean age: 68 years; 74% female; and 78% overweight) were included. The mean reduction in pain at 12 months was 37.7%; the total WOMAC score improved by 36.5% and the pain, stiffness and physical function subscores returned improvements of 32.1%, 34.1% and 32.7%, respectively (p=0.0001 with respect to baseline). At 12 months, a statistically significant 62.2% of patients obtained an improvement equal to or greater than the MCII. The mean PGA score at baseline was 2.44 and 1.46 at 12 months (p<0.05), and the mean IGA scores at equivalent timepoints were 2.29 and 1.48 (p<0.05). Fourteen patients received a second injection at the 6-month follow-up visit. Eight patients reported a total of 12 treatment-related adverse events that were local, non-serious and of mild-to-moderate intensity.

conclusionWith just a single intra-articular injection, this not controlled trial suggests that MPS-HA2% is effective 12 months after the procedure in most cases. Patient tolerability and safety were both optimal (NCT03852914).

Indexed as

hyaluronic acidosteoarthritispainviscosupplementation

Identifiers

PMID34321921
PMCPMC8312328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.