ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021
Influencing Factors and Prognostic Value of
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of anQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- A radiogenomics study onBMC cancer · 2025Article
- Effect ofPakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Establishment of a prognosis prediction model for lung squamous cell carcinoma related to PET/CT: basing on immunogenic cell death-related lncRNA.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Relationship between Systemic Inflammatory Markers, GLUT1 Expression, and Maximum 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Their Prognostic Significance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A novel analytical approach for outcome prediction in newly diagnosed NSCLC based on [European radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to explore factors influencing metabolic and volumetric parameters of [
methodsRetrospective analysis was performed on 133 NSCLC patients who received
resultsThere were significant differences in metabolic and volumetric parameters (SUVmax, SUVpeak, SULmax, SULpeak and TLG) between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of NSCLC. SUVmax, SUVpeak, SULmax, SULpeak, MTV and TLG were correlated with tumor marker NSE and TNM stage. MTV and TLG were related to CYFRA21-1, and only MTV was associated with SCC-ag. SUVpeak and SULmax were related to P53. In addition, early SULpeak and delayed MTV were significant prognostic factors of 1-year OS, while early SUVpeak, delayed TLG and delayed MTV were predictive factors of 2-year OS in NSCLC.
conclusionThe metabolic and volumetric parameters of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.