SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2021
Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recurrence rates following endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors (> 20 mm): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Pooled it
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Surgery or Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Metachronous Early Gastric Cancer: a Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Pooled it
- Prospective single-arm trial on feasibility and safety of an endoscopic robotic system for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection.Endoscopy · 2025Trial
- The current state of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the UK: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Management of Large Non-Pedunculated Polyps of the Colon: Practice-Oriented Answers to Clinical Questions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Large colorectal lesions: Expanding the boundaries of endoscopic management.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- A novel model of dual-network composite hydrogels for application in endoscopic submucosal dissection.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Advancements in endoscopic closure: Embracing a new era of managing complications and postprocedural defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Retrospective Cohort Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions: A Single-Center Experience.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2025Article
- Endoscopic mucosal resection with an over-the-scope clip for colorectal tumors (with video).DEN open · 2025Article
- Post-polypectomy colorectal bleeding: current strategies and the way forward.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- A staged approach to resecting a large rectal polyp using endoscopic mucosal resection and trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Survey of the Actual Practices Used for Endoscopic Removal of Colon Polyps in Korea: A Comparison with the Current Guidelines.Gut and liver · 2025Article
- Percutaneous needle decompression for tension pneumoperitoneum during GI endoscopy: a step-by-step guide.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025Review
- Algorithmic approach for endoscopic management of colorectal polyps: an up-to-date review.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2025Review
- Endoscopic approaches to the management of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: A state-of-the-art narrative review.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Large non-pedunculated colorectal polyp management: The elephant in the room.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has shown to be effective in management of colorectal neoplasm in the Asian countries, while its implementation in Western countries where endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is preferred is still debatable.
aimTo compare the surgical, histological, and oncological outcomes between ESD and EMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps, with subgroup analysis comparing the efficacy of ESD and EMR between Japan and the rest of the world.
methodsEmbase and Medline databases were searched from inception to October 2020 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for studies comparing
resultsOf 281344 colorectal polyps from 21 studies were included. When compared to EMR, the pooled analysis revealed ESD was associated with higher
conclusionESD resulted in better resection outcomes and lower recurrence compared to EMR. With appropriate training, ESD is preferred over EMR as the first-line therapy for resection of colorectal polyps, without restricting to lesions greater than 20 mm and those with high suspicion of submucosal invasion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.