ArticleScientific data2021
309 metagenome assembled microbial genomes from deep sediment samples in the Gulfs of Kathiawar Peninsula.
Article in Scientific data, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recovery of 679 metagenome-assembled genomes from different soil depths along a precipitation gradient.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Article
- Metagenome sequencing and recovery of 444 metagenome-assembled genomes from the biofloc aquaculture system.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Wood-Ljungdahl pathway found in novel marine Korarchaeota groups illuminates their evolutionary history.mSystems · 2023Article
- Microbial community structure and exploration of bioremediation enzymes: functional metagenomics insight into Arabian Sea sediments.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2023Article
- Trait biases in microbial reference genomes.Scientific data · 2023Article
- 309 metagenome assembled microbial genomes from deep sediment samples in the Gulfs of Kathiawar Peninsula.Scientific data · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prokaryoplankton genomes from the deep marine sediments are less explored compared to shallow shore sediments. The Gulfs of Kathiawar peninsula experience varied currents and inputs from different on-shore activities. Any perturbations would directly influence the microbiome and their normal homeostasis. Advancements in reconstructing genomes from metagenomes allows us to understand the role of individual unculturable microbes in ecological niches like the Gulf sediments. Here, we report 309 bacterial and archaeal genomes assembled from metagenomics data of deep sediments from sites in the Gulf of Khambhat and Gulf of Kutch as well as a sample from the Arabian Sea. Phylogenomics classified them into 5 archaeal and 18 bacterial phyla. The genomes will facilitate understanding of the physiology, adaptation and impact of on-shore anthropogenic activities on the deep sediment microbes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.