Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34321476›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Gene-drive suppression of mosquito populations in large cages as a bridge between lab and field.

Andrew Hammond, Paola Pollegioni, Tania Persampieri, Ace North, Roxana Minuz, Alessandro Trusso, Alessandro Bucci, Kyros Kyrou, Ioanna Morianou, Alekos Simoni and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Age-dependent mating dynamics, body size, and sex ratio in colonisedCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Advances in population-based interventions to control falciparum malaria.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Andrew Hammond *Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1757-5009
Paola Pollegioni *Genetics & Ecology Platform, Polo d'Innovazione di Genomica Genetica e Biologia, Terni, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6388-1931
Tania Persampieri *Genetics & Ecology Platform, Polo d'Innovazione di Genomica Genetica e Biologia, Terni, Italy.
Ace NorthDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4253-396X
Roxana MinuzGenetics & Ecology Platform, Polo d'Innovazione di Genomica Genetica e Biologia, Terni, Italy.
Alessandro TrussoGenetics & Ecology Platform, Polo d'Innovazione di Genomica Genetica e Biologia, Terni, Italy.
Alessandro BucciGenetics & Ecology Platform, Polo d'Innovazione di Genomica Genetica e Biologia, Terni, Italy.
Kyros KyrouDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4919-2459
Ioanna MorianouDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alekos SimoniDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Tony NolanDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK. Tony.Nolan@lstmed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2982-8333
Ruth MüllerGenetics & Ecology Platform, Polo d'Innovazione di Genomica Genetica e Biologia, Terni, Italy. rmuller@itg.be.ORCID 0000-0003-3909-3876
Andrea CrisantiDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK. a.drcrisanti@imperial.ac.uk.
Polo d’Innovazione di Genomica · ITImperial College London · GBGoethe University Frankfurt · DEInstitute of Ecosystem Study · ITJohns Hopkins University · USLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-based gene-drives targeting the gene doublesex in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae effectively suppressed the reproductive capability of mosquito populations reared in small laboratory cages. To bridge the gap between laboratory and the field, this gene-drive technology must be challenged with vector ecology.Here we report the suppressive activity of the gene-drive in age-structured An. gambiae populations in large indoor cages that permit complex feeding and reproductive behaviours.The gene-drive element spreads rapidly through the populations, fully supresses the population within one year and without selecting for resistance to the gene drive. Approximate Bayesian computation allowed retrospective inference of life-history parameters from the large cages and a more accurate prediction of gene-drive behaviour under more ecologically-relevant settings.Generating data to bridge laboratory and field studies for invasive technologies is challenging. Our study represents a paradigm for the stepwise and sound development of vector control tools based on gene-drive.

Indexed as

Gene Drive TechnologyAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAnophelesBayes TheoremClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsHousing, AnimalMalariaMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34321476
PMCPMC8319305
OpenAlexW3185471261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.