Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34321307›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

DEveloping Tests for Endometrial Cancer deTection (DETECT): protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study of urine and vaginal samples for the detection of endometrial cancer by cytology in women with postmenopausal bleeding.

Eleanor R Jones, Suzanne Carter, Helena O'Flynn, Kelechi Njoku, Chloe E Barr, Nadira Narine, David Shelton, Durgesh Rana, Emma J Crosbie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. A Focused Clinical Review of Lynch Syndrome.Cancer management and research · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eleanor R JonesDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Suzanne CarterDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Helena O'FlynnDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kelechi NjokuDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Chloe E BarrDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Nadira NarineManchester Cytology Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
David SheltonManchester Cytology Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Durgesh RanaManchester Cytology Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Emma J CrosbieDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK emma.crosbie@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0284-8630
University of Manchester · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C147/A25254Department of Health DRF-2018-11-ST2-054Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostmenopausal bleeding (PMB), the red flag symptom for endometrial cancer, triggers urgent investigation by transvaginal ultrasound scan, hysteroscopy and/or endometrial biopsy. These investigations are costly, invasive and often painful or distressing for women. In a pilot study, we found that voided urine and non-invasive vaginal samples from women with endometrial cancer contain malignant cells that can be identified by cytology. The aim of the METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study of women referred to secondary care with PMB. Eligible women will be asked to provide a self-collected voided urine sample and a vaginal sample collected with a Delphi screener before routine clinical procedures. Pairs of specialist cytologists, blinded to participant cancer status, will assess and classify samples independently, with differences settled by consensus review or involving a third cytologist. Results will be compared with clinical outcomes from standard diagnostic tests. A sample size of 2000 women will have 80% power to establish a sensitivity of vaginal samples for endometrial cancer detection by cytology of ≥85%±7%, assuming 5% endometrial cancer prevalence. The primary objective is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of urogenital samples for endometrial cancer detection by cytology. Secondary objectives include the acceptability of urine and vaginal sampling to women. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the North West-Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee (16/NW/0660) and the Health Research Authority. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals, presentation at conferences and via charity websites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN58863784.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineEndometrial NeoplasmsEndometriumFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsPostmenopauseUltrasonographyUterine Hemorrhagecytopathologygynaecological oncologyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34321307
PMCPMC8320249
OpenAlexW3186200386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.