Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34321305›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol.

Ambreen Sayani, Muhanad Ahmed Ali, Ann Marie Corrado, Carolyn Ziegler, Alex Sadler, Christina Williams, Aisha Lofters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ambreen SayaniWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ambreen.sayani@wchospital.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5391-7769
Muhanad Ahmed AliWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Marie CorradoWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carolyn ZieglerLibrary Services, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alex SadlerWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christina WilliamsWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Aisha LoftersWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen designing any health intervention, it is important to respond to the unequal determinants of health by prioritising the allocation of resources and tailoring interventions based on the disproportionate burden of illness. This approach, called the targeting of priority populations, can prevent a widening of health inequities, particularly those inequities which can be further widened by differences in the uptake of an intervention. The objective of this scoping review is to describe intervention(s) designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening, including the health impact on priority populations and to describe knowledge and implementation gaps to inform the design of equitable lung cancer screening.

methodsWe will conduct a scoping review following the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley. We will conduct comprehensive searches for lung cancer screening promotion interventions in Ovid Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) and Scopus. We will include published English language peer-reviewed and grey literature published between January 2000 and 2020 that describe an intervention designed to increase the uptake of low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. Articles not in English or not describing LDCT will be excluded. Three authors will review retrieved literature in three steps: title, abstract and then full text. Three additional authors will review discrepancies. Authors will extract data from full-text papers into a chart adapted from the Template for Intervention Description and Republication checklist, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and a Health Equity Impact Assessment tool. Findings will be presented using a narrative synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The knowledge synthesised will be used to inform the equitable design of lung cancer screening and disseminated through conferences, publications and shared with relevant partners. The study does not require research ethics approval as literature is available online.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsHumansPeer ReviewPopulation GroupsResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topicprotocols & guidelinesrespiratory tract tumourssocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID34321305
PMCPMC8320256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.