Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34321205›Full record

ArticleScience advances2021

Model-based aversive learning in humans is supported by preferential task state reactivation.

Toby Wise, Yunzhe Liu, Fatima Chowdhury, Raymond J Dolan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Distinct replay signatures for prospective decision-making and memory preservation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Decoding cognition from spontaneous neural activity.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Toby WiseMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, UK. t.wise@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9021-3282
Yunzhe LiuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-9403
Fatima ChowdhuryMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2013-5370
Raymond J DolanMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9356-761X
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GBBeijing Normal University · CNCalifornia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harm avoidance is critical for survival, yet little is known regarding the neural mechanisms supporting avoidance in the absence of trial-and-error experience. Flexible avoidance may be supported by a mental model (i.e., model-based), a process for which neural reactivation and sequential replay have emerged as candidate mechanisms. During an aversive learning task, combined with magnetoencephalography, we show prospective and retrospective reactivation during planning and learning, respectively, coupled to evidence for sequential replay. Specifically, when individuals plan in an aversive context, we find preferential reactivation of subsequently chosen goal states. Stronger reactivation is associated with greater hippocampal theta power. At outcome receipt, unchosen goal states are reactivated regardless of outcome valence. Replay of paths leading to goal states was modulated by outcome valence, with aversive outcomes associated with stronger reverse replay than safe outcomes. Our findings are suggestive of avoidance involving simulation of unexperienced states through hippocampally mediated reactivation and replay.

Identifiers

PMID34321205
PMCPMC8318377
OpenAlexW3185818441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.