Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34321133›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2022

Awareness of and reactions to health and environmental harms of red meat among parents in the United States.

Anna H Grummon, Dina Goodman, Lindsay M Jaacks, Lindsey Smith Taillie, Christina A Chauvenet, Meg G Salvia, Eric B Rimm

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna H GrummonHarvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Dina GoodmanDepartment of Global Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lindsay M JaacksGlobal Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Lindsey Smith TaillieDepartment of Nutrition, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Christina A ChauvenetArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Meg G SalviaDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Eric B RimmDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USHarvard Global Health Institute · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
TRAINING GRANT IN ACADEMIC NUTRITIONT32DK007703 · NIDDK · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI CHRISTOPHER P DUGGAN, Frank B Hu · 1994 to 2026
$7.8M
CVD Epidemiology Training Program in Behavior, the Environment and Global HealthT32HL098048 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Goodarz Danaei, ERIC B RIMM · 2009 to 2026
$6.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098048NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007703Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 216042/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvidence of the health and environmental harms of red meat is growing, yet little is known about which harms may be most impactful to include in meat reduction messages. This study examined which harms consumers are most aware of and which most discourage them from wanting to eat red meat.

designWithin-subjects randomised experiment. Participants responded to questions about their awareness of, and perceived discouragement in response to, eight health and eight environmental harms of red meat presented in random order. Discouragement was assessed on a 1-to-5 Likert-type scale.

settingOnline survey.

participants544 US parents.

resultsA minority of participants reported awareness that red meat contributes to health harms (ranging from 8 % awareness for prostate cancer to 28 % for heart disease) or environmental harms (ranging from 13 % for water shortages and deforestation to 22 % for climate change). Among specific harms, heart disease elicited the most discouragement (mean = 2·82 out of 5), followed by early death (mean = 2·79) and plants and animals going extinct (mean = 2·75), though most harms elicited similar discouragement (range of means, 2·60-2·82). In multivariable analyses, participants who were younger, identified as Black, identified as politically liberal, had higher general perceptions that red meat is bad for health and had higher usual red meat consumption reported being more discouraged from wanting to eat red meat in response to health and environmental harms (all P < 0·05).

conclusionsMessages about a variety of health and environmental harms of red meat could inform consumers and motivate reductions in red meat consumption.

Indexed as

Red MeatAnimalsHumansMaleMeatParentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesCommunicationEnvironmental sustainabilityFood labellingMeatMessagesParents

Identifiers

PMID34321133
PMCPMC8799779
OpenAlexW3186212258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.