Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34321107›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2021

Building capacity for implementation-the KT Challenge.

Agnes T Black, Marla Steinberg, Amanda E Chisholm, Kristi Coldwell, Alison M Hoens, Jiak Chin Koh, Allana LeBlanc, Martha Mackay, Amy Salmon, M Elizabeth Snow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Building a new regional home for implementation science: Annual Midwest Clinical & Translational Research Meetings.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Agnes T BlackProvidence Health Care, 1190 Hornby St, Suite 409G, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2K5, Canada. ablack@providencehealth.bc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9144-9564
Marla SteinbergEvaluation & KT Consultant and Educator, 3037 West 13th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V6K 2V1, Canada.
Amanda E ChisholmVancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 6/F, 2635 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Kristi ColdwellTransplant Research Foundation of BC, 555 W 12th Ave 3rd floor, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 3X7, Canada.
Alison M HoensProvidence Health Care and University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Jiak Chin KohProvidence Health Care, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Allana LeBlancVancouver Coastal Health, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Martha MackayProvidence Health Care and University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Amy SalmonCentre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, 588 - 1081 Burrard Street, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
M Elizabeth SnowCentre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, 588 - 1081 Burrard Street, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe KT Challenge program supports health care professionals to effectively implement evidence-based practices. Unlike other knowledge translation (KT) programs, this program is grounded in capacity building, focuses on health care professionals (HCPs), and uses a multi-component intervention. This study presents the evaluation of the KT Challenge program to assess the impact on uptake, KT capacity, and practice change.

methodsThe evaluation used a mixed-methods retrospective pre-post design involving surveys and review of documents such as teams' final reports. Online surveys collecting both quantitative and qualitative data were deployed at four time points (after both workshops, 6 months into implementation, and at the end of the 2-year funded projects) to measure KT capacity (knowledge, skills, and confidence) and impact on practice change. Qualitative data was analyzed using a general inductive approach and quantitative data was analyzed using non-parametric statistics.

resultsParticipants reported statistically significant increases in knowledge and confidence across both workshops, at the 6-month mark of their projects, and at the end of their projects. In addition, at the 6-month check-in, practitioners reported statistically significant improvements in their ability to implement practice changes. In the first cohort of the program, of the teams who were able to complete their projects, half were able to show demonstrable practice changes.

conclusionsThe KT Challenge was successful in improving the capacity of HCPs to implement evidence-based practice changes and has begun to show demonstrable improvements in a number of practice areas. The program is relevant to a variety of HCPs working in diverse practice settings and is relatively inexpensive to implement. Like all practice improvement programs in health care settings, a number of challenges emerged stemming from the high turnover of staff and the limited capacity of some practitioners to take on anything beyond direct patient care. Efforts to address these challenges have been added to subsequent cohorts of the program and ongoing evaluation will examine if they are successful. The KT Challenge program has continued to garner great interest among practitioners, even in the midst of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic, and shows promise for organizations looking for better ways to mobilize knowledge to improve patient care and empower staff. This study contributes to the implementation science literature by providing a description and evaluation of a new model for embedding KT practice skills in health care settings.

Indexed as

Capacity buildingEvidence-based practiceHealth care professionalsImplementation scienceKnowledge translation

Identifiers

PMID34321107
PMCPMC8316705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.