Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34321101›Full record

ArticleBMC nutrition2021

Best practices and opportunities for integrating nutrition specific into nutrition sensitive interventions in fragile contexts: a systematic review.

Leila H Abdullahi, Gilbert K Rithaa, Bonface Muthomi, Florence Kyallo, Clementina Ngina, Mohamed A Hassan, Mohamed A Farah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Leila H AbdullahiAfrican Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), Nairobi, Kenya. Leylaz@live.co.za.
Gilbert K RithaaHorn Population Research & Development (HPRD), Mogadishu, Somalia.
Bonface MuthomiHorn Population Research & Development (HPRD), Mogadishu, Somalia.
Florence KyalloJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Clementina NginaIndependent nutrition consultant, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mohamed A HassanScaling Up Nutrition (SUN), Office of Prime Minister, Mogadishu, Somalia.
Mohamed A FarahScaling Up Nutrition (SUN), Office of Prime Minister, Mogadishu, Somalia.
Hormuud University · SOPrime Minister's Office · BNAfrican Institute for Development Policy · KEJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology · KEMogadishu University · SO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnnually, undernutrition contributes globally to 45% (3.1 million) of preventable deaths in children under 5. Effect following undernutrition i.e. physical growth & cognitive development etc. can be prevented during the first 1000 days also called window of opportunity. There is substantial evidence of positive nutrition outcomes resulting from integrating nutrition-specific interventions into nutrition specific program. However, there is paucity of knowledge on establishing and sustaining effective integration of nutrition intervention in fragile context. The objective of this review is to map and review the integration of nutrition-specific intervention to nutrition sensitive program and its impacts on nutrition outcomes.

methodsIn the study, we systematically searched the literature on integrated nutrition intervention into multi-sectoral programme in PUBMED, Google's Scholar, the Cochrane Library, World Health Organisation (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank and trial registers from their inception until Oct 30, 2020 for up-to-date published and grey resources. We screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in duplicates. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020209730).

resultForty-four studies were included in this review, outlining the integration of nutrition-specific interventions among children 0-59 months with various existing programme. Most common integration platform in the study included integrated community case management and Integrated Management of Childhood Illness, Child Health Days, immunization, early child development, and cash transfers. Limited quantitative data were suggestive of some positive impact on nutrition and non-nutrition outcomes with a number of model of integration which varies according to the context and demands of the particular setting in which integration occurs.

conclusionOverall, existing evidence for nutrition sensitive and specific interventions is not robust and remains limited. It's worthwhile to note, for future studies/interventions should be based on the context key criteria like relevance, political support, effectiveness, feasibility, expected contribution to health system strengthening, local capacities, ease of integration and targeting for sustainability, cost effectiveness and financial availability.

Indexed as

IntegrationMulti-sectoral programmeNutrition outcomeNutrition sensitiveNutrition specific

Identifiers

PMID34321101
PMCPMC8320180
OpenAlexW3185277289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.