Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34321068›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

Reliability of mechanical ventilation during continuous chest compressions: a crossover study of transport ventilators in a human cadaver model of CPR.

Simon Orlob, Johannes Wittig, Christoph Hobisch, Daniel Auinger, Gabriel Honnef, Tobias Fellinger, Robin Ristl, Otmar Schindler, Philipp Metnitz, Georg Feigl and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Simon OrlobDivision of Anaesthesiology for Cardiovascular Surgery and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Austria. simon.orlob@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7799-4822
Johannes WittigMedical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Christoph HobischDivision of General Anaesthesiology, Emergency- and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Daniel AuingerDivision of General Anaesthesiology, Emergency- and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Gabriel HonnefDivision of General Anaesthesiology, Emergency- and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Tobias FellingerCentre for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Robin RistlCentre for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Otmar SchindlerDepartment of Internal and Respiratory Medicine, Intensive Care Unit Enzenbach, State Hospital Graz II, Hörgas 30, 8112, Gratwein, Austria.
Philipp MetnitzDivision of General Anaesthesiology, Emergency- and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Georg FeiglDivision of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Medical University of Graz, Harrachgasse 21, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Gerhard PrauseDivision of General Anaesthesiology, Emergency- and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Austria.

Funding

Österreichische Gesellschaft für Notfall- und Katastrophenmedizin Reinhard Malzer Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have stated that hyperventilation often occurs in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) mainly due to excessive ventilation frequencies, especially when a manual valve bag is used. Transport ventilators may provide mandatory ventilation with predetermined tidal volumes and without the risk of hyperventilation. Nonetheless, interactions between chest compressions and ventilations are likely to occur. We investigated whether transport ventilators can provide adequate alveolar ventilation during continuous chest compression in adult CPR.

methodsA three-period crossover study with three common transport ventilators in a cadaver model of CPR was carried out. The three ventilators 'MEDUMAT Standard²', 'Oxylog 3000 plus', and 'Monnal T60' represent three different interventions, providing volume-controlled continuous mandatory ventilation (VC-CMV) via an endotracheal tube with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg predicted body weight. Proximal airflow was measured, and the net tidal volume was derived for each respiratory cycle. The deviation from the predetermined tidal volume was calculated and analysed. Several mixed linear models were calculated with the cadaver as a random factor and ventilator, height, sex, crossover period and incremental number of each ventilation within the period as covariates to evaluate differences between ventilators.

resultsOverall median deviation of net tidal volume from predetermined tidal volume was - 21.2 % (IQR: 19.6, range: [- 87.9 %; 25.8 %]) corresponding to a tidal volume of 4.75 mL/kg predicted body weight (IQR: 1.2, range: [0.7; 7.6]). In a mixed linear model, the ventilator model, the crossover period, and the cadaver's height were significant factors for decreased tidal volume. The estimated effects of tidal volume deviation for each ventilator were - 14.5 % [95 %-CI: -22.5; -6.5] (p = 0.0004) for 'Monnal T60', - 30.6 % [95 %-CI: -38.6; -22.6] (p < 0.0001) for 'Oxylog 3000 plus' and - 31.0 % [95 %-CI: -38.9; -23.0] (p < 0.0001) for 'MEDUMAT Standard²'.

conclusionsAll investigated transport ventilators were able to provide alveolar ventilation even though chest compressions considerably decreased tidal volumes. Our results support the concept of using ventilators to avoid excessive ventilatory rates in CPR. This experimental study suggests that healthcare professionals should carefully monitor actual tidal volumes to recognise the occurrence of hypoventilation during continuous chest compressions.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationRespiration, ArtificialAdultCadaverCross-Over StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsTidal VolumeVentilators, MechanicalArtificial respirationCardiac arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestReversed airflowTidal volumeVentilators, mechanical

Identifiers

PMID34321068
PMCPMC8316711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.