Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34320972›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2021

Psychometric properties of the ethical conflict in nursing questionnaire critical care version among Chinese nurses: a cross-sectional study.

Yuanfei Liu, Nianqi Cui, Yuping Zhang, Xiyi Wang, Hui Zhang, Dandan Chen, Shunxia Sun, Jingfen Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Consequences of Moral Outrage among Nurses: A Scoping Review.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuanfei Liu *The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine (SAHZU), No.88 Jiefang road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.
Nianqi Cui *The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine (SAHZU), No.88 Jiefang road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yuping ZhangThe Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine (SAHZU), No.88 Jiefang road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xiyi WangSchool of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Hui ZhangFaculty of Nursing, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Dandan ChenFaculty of Nursing, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Shunxia SunDepartment of Nursing, The General Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Jingfen JinThe Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine (SAHZU), No.88 Jiefang road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang Province, China. zrjzkhl@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthical conflicts are common in the critical care setting, and have compromised job satisfaction and nursing care quality. Using reliable and valid instruments to measure the ethical conflict is essential. This study aimed to translate the Ethical Conflict in Nursing Questionnaire - Critical Care Version into Chinese and determine the reliability and validity in the population of Chinese nurses.

methodsResearchers obtained permission and followed the translation-backward method to develop the Chinese version of the Ethical Conflict in Nursing Questionnaire - Critical Care Version (ECNQ-CCV-C). Relevant psychometric properties were selected according to the Consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments checklist. Critical care nurses were recruited from two tertiary public hospitals in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, and Kunming, Yunnan Province. Of the 264 nurses we approached, 248 gave their consent and completed the study.

resultsThe ECNQ-CCV-C achieved Cronbach's alphas 0.902 and McDonald's omega coefficient 0.903. The test-retest reliability was satisfactory within a 2-week interval (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.757). A unidimensional structure of the ECNQ-CCV-C was determined. Confirmatory factor analysis supported acceptable structure validity. Concurrent validity was confirmed by a moderate relation with a measure for hospital ethical climate (r = - 0.33, p < 0.01). The model structure was invariant across different gender groups, with no floor/ceiling effect.

conclusionsThe ECNQ-CCV-C demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity among Chinese nurses and had great clinical utility in critical care nursing.

Indexed as

Chinese versionCOSMIN checklistEthical conflictPsychometric propertiesReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID34320972
PMCPMC8316889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.