ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2021
A Multi-center Genome-wide Association Study of Cervical Dystonia.
Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Risk Factors in Isolated Dystonia Escape Genome-Wide Association Studies.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2024Article
- Blood-Based Proteomics for Adult-Onset Focal Dystonias.Annals of neurology · 2024Article
- Isolated Cervical Dystonia: Diagnosis and Classification.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023Review
- Clinical and genotypic analysis in determining dystonia non-motor phenotypic heterogeneity: a UK Biobank study.Journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Association Between Dystonia-Related Genetic Loci and Parkinson's Disease in Eastern China.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
55 authors at 20 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral monogenic causes for isolated dystonia have been identified, but they collectively account for only a small proportion of cases. Two genome-wide association studies have reported a few potential dystonia risk loci; but conclusions have been limited by small sample sizes, partial coverage of genetic variants, or poor reproducibility.
objectiveTo identify robust genetic variants and loci in a large multicenter cervical dystonia cohort using a genome-wide approach.
methodsWe performed a genome-wide association study using cervical dystonia samples from the Dystonia Coalition. Logistic and linear regressions, including age, sex, and population structure as covariates, were employed to assess variant- and gene-based genetic associations with disease status and age at onset. We also performed a replication study for an identified genome-wide significant signal.
resultsAfter quality control, 919 cervical dystonia patients compared with 1491 controls of European ancestry were included in the analyses. We identified one genome-wide significant variant (rs2219975, chromosome 3, upstream of COL8A1, P-value 3.04 × 10
conclusionThe genetic underpinnings of cervical dystonia are complex and likely consist of multiple distinct variants of small effect sizes. Larger sample sizes may be needed to provide sufficient statistical power to address the presumably multi-genic etiology of cervical dystonia. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.