Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34320109›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia2021

Three Decades of Contact Lens-associated Microbial Keratitis in a Referral Hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.

Jorge Agi, Talita Trevizani Rocchetti, Maria Cecília Zorat Yu, Michelle Lima Farah, Fabio Ramos, Denise de Freitas, Ana Luisa Höfling-Lima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Scleral lenses and PROSE: indications, complications, and future challenges.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jorge AgiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0475-4622
Talita Trevizani RocchettiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7909-5094
Maria Cecília Zorat YuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Michelle Lima FarahDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fabio RamosDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Denise de FreitasDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ana Luisa Höfling-LimaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to analyze patient data and the laboratory results of corneal samples collected from patients followed at the Ophthalmology Department, Hospital São Paulo, Brazil over a 30-year period, and correlate the analize with contact lens wearing.

methodsCorneal samples from patients diagnosed clinically with microbial keratitis between January 1987 and December 2016 were included in this study. Cultures that were positive for bacteria, fungi, and Acanthamoeba spp. were analyzed retrospectively. To ascertain if the number of patients with contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis (as a risk factor for microbial infection) changed over time, the analysis was divided into three decades: 1987-1996, 1997-2006, and 2007-2016. Information pertaining to patient gender and age, as well as type of organism isolated, were compared among these periods.

resultsThe corneal samples of 10.562 patients with a clinical diagnosis of microbial keratitis were included in the study, among which 1.848 cases were related to the use of contact lenses. The results revealed that the frequency of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis increased over the last two decades. Overall, females had contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis more frequently (59.5%). Patients aged 19-40 years also had contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis more frequently in all study periods. Staphylococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. were the most frequent Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively, in the microbial keratitis groups. Among the fungal cases of microbial keratitis, filamentous fungi were the most frequent fungi over the entire study period, with Fusarium spp. being the most frequent fungi in the group with microbial keratitis not associated with contact lens wearing (p<0.001). Samples positive for Acanthamoeba spp. and Pseudomonas spp. were significantly correlated with contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis (p<0.001).

conclusionsFemales and young adults aged 19-40 years exhibited the highest frequency of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis in our study. Staphylococcus spp. and Fusarium spp. were the predominant bacteria and fungi, respectively, isolated from corneal samples. Pseudomonas spp. and Acanthamoeba spp. were significantly correlated with contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis in this study.

Indexed as

Contact LensesKeratitisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBrazilFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHospitalsHumansReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34320109
PMCPMC11878426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.