Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34320041›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Patient safety management systems and activities related to promoting voluntary in-hospital reporting and mandatory national-level reporting for patient safety issues: A cross-sectional study.

Shigeru Fujita, Kanako Seto, Yosuke Hatakeyama, Ryo Onishi, Kunichika Matsumoto, Yoji Nagai, Shuhei Iida, Tomohiro Hirao, Junko Ayuzawa, Yoshiko Shimamori and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Factors affecting reporting of patient safety incidents in the Eastern Cape primary health care.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shigeru FujitaToho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kanako SetoToho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke HatakeyamaToho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo OnishiToho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kunichika MatsumotoToho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoji NagaiHitachinaka General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Shuhei IidaNerima General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro HiraoFaculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.
Junko AyuzawaFaculty of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshiko ShimamoriIwate Medical University School of Nursing, Iwate, Japan.
Tomonori HasegawaToho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1057-9867
Toho University · JPHitachi General Hospital · JPIwate Medical University · JPKagawa University · JPKyushu University · JPNerima General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both voluntary in-hospital reporting and mandatory national-level reporting systems for patient safety issues need to work well to develop a patient safety learning system that is effective in preventing the recurrence of adverse events. Some of the hospital systems and activities may increase voluntary in-hospital reporting and mandatory national-level reporting. This study aimed to identify the hospital systems and activities that increase voluntary in-hospital reporting and mandatory national-level reporting for patient safety issues. An anonymous mail survey of hospitals in Japan was conducted in 2017. The hospitals were selected by stratified random sampling according to number of beds. The survey examined the annual number of reported events in the voluntary in-hospital reporting system for patient safety and experience of reporting unexpected patient deaths possibly due to medical interventions to the mandatory national-level reporting system in the last 2 years. The relationship of the answer to the questions with the patient safety management systems and activities at each hospital was analyzed. The response rate was 18.8% (603/3,215). The number of in-hospital reports per bed was positively related to identifying events by referring complaints or questions of patients or family members, using root cause analysis for analyzing reported events, and developing manuals or case studies based on reported events, and negatively related to the unification and standardization of medical devices and equipment. The experience with mandatory national-level reporting of serious adverse events was positively related to identifying problematic cases by a person in charge of patient safety management from the in-hospital reporting system of complications and accidental symptoms. Enhanced feedback for reporters may promote voluntary in-hospital reporting of minor cases with low litigation risks. Developing an in-hospital mechanism that examines all serious complications and accidental symptoms may promote mandatory national-level reporting of serious adverse events with high litigation risks.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesHospitalsHumansJapanMandatory ReportingPatient SafetySafety Management

Identifiers

PMID34320041
PMCPMC8318237
OpenAlexW3184014361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.