Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34320036›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A mixed methods study to evaluate participatory mapping for rural water safety planning in western Kenya.

Joseph Okotto-Okotto, Weiyu Yu, Emmah Kwoba, Samuel M Thumbi, Lorna Grace Okotto, Peggy Wanza, Diogo Trajano Gomes da Silva, Jim Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joseph Okotto-OkottoVictoria Institute for Research on Environment and Development (VIRED) International, Rabuor, Kisumu, Kenya.
Weiyu YuSchool of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4624-2139
Emmah KwobaCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-7839-5845
Samuel M ThumbiCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Lorna Grace OkottoSchool of Spatial Planning and Natural Resource Management, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Bondo, Kenya.
Peggy WanzaCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Diogo Trajano Gomes da SilvaSchool of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Jim WrightSchool of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8842-2181

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P024920/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water safety planning is an approach to ensure safe drinking-water access through comprehensive risk assessment and water supply management from catchment to consumer. However, its uptake remains low in rural areas. Participatory mapping, the process of map creation for resource management by local communities, has yet to be used for rural water safety planning. In this mixed methods study, to evaluate the validity of participatory mapping outputs for rural water safety planning and assess community understanding of water safety, 140 community members in Siaya County, Kenya, attended ten village-level participatory mapping sessions. They mapped drinking-water sources, ranked their safety and mapped potential contamination hazards. Findings were triangulated against a questionnaire survey of 234 households, conducted in parallel. In contrast to source type ranking for international monitoring, workshop participants ranked rainwater's safety above piped water and identified source types such as broken pipes not explicitly recorded in water source typologies often used for formal monitoring. Participatory mapping also highlighted the overlap between livestock grazing areas and household water sources. These findings were corroborated by the household survey and subsequent participatory meetings. However, comparison with household survey data suggested participatory mapping outputs omitted some water sources and landscape-scale contamination hazards, such as open defecation areas or flood-prone areas. In follow-up visits, participant groups ranked remediation of rainwater harvesting systems as the most acceptable intervention to address hazards. We conclude that participatory mapping can complement other established approaches to rural water safety planning by capturing informally managed source use and facilitating community engagement.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDrinking WaterFemaleHumansKenyaMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesWater SupplyYoung AdultDrinking Water

Identifiers

PMID34320036
PMCPMC8318241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.